Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Anatomic Variations in the Sacral Hiatus: Implications for Caudal Epidural Injections
- PMID: 27340767
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001448
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Anatomic Variations in the Sacral Hiatus: Implications for Caudal Epidural Injections
Abstract
Study design: Prospective study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the sacral hiatus based on ultrasonographic images.
Summary of background data: Caudal epidural injection is commonly used for the treatment of lower back pain, but blind injections commonly lead to mistakes made at the injection site due to anatomic variations in the sacral hiatus.
Methods: A total of 339 patients with low back pain or sciatica were studied using a linear-array ultrasound transducer. The transducer was placed at the sacral cornua and the distance between the bilateral cornua and the width of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the bilateral cornua were measured in the transverse view. The transducer was also placed between the two cornua and the distance between the skin and posterior sacral bony surface was measured, including the depth of the subcutaneous fat, in the longitudinal view. The surface distance was then measured from the natal cleft to the apex of the sacral hiatus.
Results: The mean distance between the bilateral cornua was 18.1 ± 3.2 mm and mean width of the sacrococcygeal ligament was 10.5 ± 2.6 mm. The mean diameter of the sacral canal was 6.8 ± 2.5 mm but 6 of 339 patients (1.8%) found less than 2 mm. The mean surface distance from the natal cleft to the apex of the sacral hiatus was 29.3 ± 12.3 mm. The distance between the sacral hiatus and the natal cleft ranged from -2.0 to 75.0 mm.
Conclusion: We believe that the variations found in the surface distance from the natal cleft to the sacral hiatus are significant for caudal epidural injection. However, the other measurements may also have clinical importance in this area.
Level of evidence: 3.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.019. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20298824
-
Assessment of factors affecting the difficulty of caudal epidural injections in adults using ultrasound.Pain Res Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct;19(5):275-9. doi: 10.1155/2014/679128. Epub 2014 Aug 11. Pain Res Manag. 2014. PMID: 25111987 Free PMC article.
-
An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block.Clin J Pain. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):51-4. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200401000-00010. Clin J Pain. 2004. PMID: 14668657
-
Caudal Epidural Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques.Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9217145. doi: 10.1155/2017/9217145. Epub 2017 Feb 26. Biomed Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28337460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiologic anatomy of the sacral canal.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;108:5-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_2. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011. PMID: 21107931 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluated anatomical variations in children by sacrococcygeal ultrasonography as a new tool: a report from a Chinese tertiary hospital.Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2528977. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2528977. Epub 2025 Jul 7. Ann Med. 2025. PMID: 40624908 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of sacral hiatus changes in children using ultrasound.Heliyon. 2024 May 17;10(10):e31526. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31526. eCollection 2024 May 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38831844 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasonography-guided catheter-over-needle insertion for caudal epidural catheter placement in adults: technical considerations.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02889-3. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40169958 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of hybrid ultrasound/fluoroscopy guidance vs only fluoroscopy guidance on procedure time and radiation exposure in caudal epidural steroid injections.Interv Pain Med. 2025 Mar 5;4(1):100567. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100567. eCollection 2025 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2025. PMID: 40124674 Free PMC article.
-
Study on MEV90 of 0.5% ropivacaine for US-guided caudal epidural block in anorectal surgery.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 19;9:1077478. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1077478. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36743672 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Crighton IM, Barry BP, Hobbs GJ. A study of the anatomy of the caudal space using magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:391–395.
-
- Chen CP, Wong AM, Hsu CC, et al. Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91:358–363.
-
- Aggarwal A, Kaur H, Batra YK, et al. Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: a cadaver study. Clin Anat 2009; 22:730–737.
-
- Kamble PC, Sharma A. Outcome of single level disc prolapse treated with transforaminal steroid versus epidural steroid versus caudal steroids. Eur Spine J 2016; 25:217–221.
-
- Stitz MY, Sommer HM. Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. Spine 1999; 24:1371–1376.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous