Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;64(8):1540-8.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.14226. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

Treatment Patterns with Antidementia Drugs in the United States: Medicare Cohort Study

Affiliations

Treatment Patterns with Antidementia Drugs in the United States: Medicare Cohort Study

Daniela Koller et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate frequency of use of two anti-dementia drug classes approved for treatment of symptoms, whether populations most likely to benefit are treated, and correlates of treatment initiation.

Design: Nationally representative cohort study.

Setting: Fee-for-service Medicare.

Participants: Elderly adults with dementia enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D in 2009 (N = 433,559) and a subset with incident dementia (n = 185,449).

Measurements: Main outcome was any prescription fill for antidementia drugs (cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) or memantine) within 1 year.

Results: Treatment with antidementia drugs occurred in 55.8% of all participants with dementia and 49.3% of those with incident dementia. There was no difference between ChEIs and memantine use according to dementia severity (measured as death within first year or living in residential care vs in a community setting) even though memantine is not indicated in mild disease. In incident cases, initiation of treatment was lower in residential care (relative risk (RR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81-0.83) and with more comorbidities (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.96-0.96). Sixty percent of participants were managed in primary care alone. Seeing a neurologist (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.06-1.09) or psychiatrist (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.16-1.19) was associated with higher likelihood of treatment than seeing a primary care provider alone, and seeing geriatrician was associated with with lower likelihood (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99). Across the United States, the proportion of newly diagnosed individuals started on antidementia treatment varied from 32% to 66% across hospital referral regions.

Conclusion: Antidementia drugs are used less often in people with late disease, but there is no differentiation in medication choice. Although primary care providers most often prescribe antidementia medication without specialty support, differences in practice between specialties are evident.

Keywords: Medicare; dementia; drug treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment with anti-dementia Drugs among Medicare Fee-for-Service Part D Beneficiaries with a Prevalent or New Diagnosis of Dementia in 2009 *Note: Died within a year of the first occurrence of a claims with a diagnosis representing dementia in 2009
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modeled Association of Beneficiary Characteristics with Treatment with Anti-dementia Drug within 1 year of Newly Diagnosed Dementia Note: Model also adjusted for individual low income subsidy status, number of survived days, visits and hospitalizations in year prior to diagnosis, and Hospital Referral Region of residence
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variation in Treatment with anti-dementia Drugs across Hospital Referral Regions HRR) of the United States, adjusted for population differences in age, gender, race, and low income subsidy status

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prince MJ, Bryce R, Albanese E, et al. The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63–75. - PubMed
    1. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr P, et al. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. 2013;80(19):1778–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wimo A, Jönsson L, Bond J, et al. The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):1–11. e3. - PubMed
    1. Hurd MD, Martorell P, Delavande A, et al. Monetary costs of dementia in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1326–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Alzheimer's Project Act. USA: 2011. Public Law 111 -375-Jan 4 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms