Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;31(3):1119-1135.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5076-6. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

Comparison of fatigue accumulated during and after prolonged robotic and laparoscopic surgical methods: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of fatigue accumulated during and after prolonged robotic and laparoscopic surgical methods: a cross-sectional study

Manuel González-Sánchez et al. Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to analyse the fatigue experienced by surgeons during and after performing robotic and laparoscopic surgery and to analyse muscle function, self-perceived fatigue and postural balance.

Methods: Cross-sectional study considering two surgical protocols (laparoscopic and robotic) with two different roles (chief and assistant surgeon). Fatigue was recorded in two ways: pre- and post-surgery using questionnaires [Profile of Mood States (POMS), Quick Questionnaire Piper Fatigue Scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-related fatigue] and parametrising functional tests [handgrip and single-leg balance test (SLBT)] and during the intervention by measuring the muscle activation of eight different muscles via surface electromyography and kinematic measurement (using inertial sensors). Each surgery profile intervention (robotic/laparoscopy-chief/assistant surgeon) was measured three times, totalling 12 measured surgery interventions. The minimal duration of surgery was 180 min.

Results: Pre- and post-surgery, all questionnaires showed that the magnitude of change was higher for the chief surgeon compared with the assistant surgeon, with differences of between 10 % POMS and 16.25 % VAS (robotic protocol) and between 3.1 % POMS and 12.5 % VAS (laparoscopic protocol). In the inter-profile comparison, the chief surgeon (robotic protocol) showed a lower balance capacity during the SLBT after surgery. During the intervention, the kinematic variables showed significant differences between the chief and assistant surgeon in the robotic protocol, but not in the laparoscopic protocol. Regarding muscle activation, there was not enough muscle activity to generate fatigue.

Conclusion: Prolonged surgery increased fatigue in the surgeon; however, the magnitude of fatigue differed between surgical profiles. The surgeon who experienced the greatest fatigue was the chief surgeon in the robotic protocol.

Keywords: Balance; Handgrip; Kinematic measurement; Profile of Mood States; Quick Questionnaire Piper Fatigue Scale; Surface EMG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):466-8 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Mar;210(3):306-13 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):1-13 - PubMed
    1. Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(4):3545-94 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1365-71 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources