Bone Remodeling Around Implants with External Hexagon and Morse-Taper Connections: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth, Clinical Trial
- PMID: 27353076
- DOI: 10.1111/cid.12437
Bone Remodeling Around Implants with External Hexagon and Morse-Taper Connections: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth, Clinical Trial
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate clinical, radiographic, microbiologic, and biomechanical parameters related to bone remodeling around implants with external hexagon (EH) and Morse-taper (MT) connections.
Materials and methods: Twelve totally edentulous patients received four custom-made implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Two of those implants had the same macroscopic design, but different prosthetic connections. All patients received an immediate implant-supported prosthesis. Clinical parameters (periimplant probing pocket depth (PPD), modified gingival index (mGI), and mucosal thickness (MTh)) were evaluated at 12 months follow-up. The distance between the top of the implant and the first bone-to-implant contact (IT-FBIC) was evaluated on standardized digital peri-apical radiographs acquired at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Samples of the subgingival microbiota were collected 1, 3, and 6 months after implant loading and used for the quantification of Tanerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggragatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Further, 36 computerized-tomography based finite element (FE) models were accomplished, simulating each patient under three loading conditions.
Results: The evaluated clinical parameters were equal for EH and MT implants. Mean IT-FBIC was significantly different between the tested connections (1.17 ± 0.44 mm for EH, and 0.17 ± 0.54 mm for MT, considering all evaluated time periods). No significant microbiological differences could be observed between tested connections. FE analysis showed a significantly higher peak of equivalent (EQV) strain (p = 0.005) for EH (mean 3,438.65 µε) compared to MT (mean 840.98 µε) connection.
Conclusions: Radiographic periimplant bone loss depends on the implant connection type. MT connections showed less periimplant bone loss, compared to EH connections.
Keywords: clinical trials; crestal bone level changes; dental implant-abutment connection; marginal bone loss.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Marginal Bone Level and Clinical Parameter Analysis Comparing External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(9):1587. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091587. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174979 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):750-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4785. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016. PMID: 27447140
-
Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1157-63. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3411. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014. PMID: 25216143 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):254-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01649.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. PMID: 19397637 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Dent. 2018 Mar;70:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 6. J Dent. 2018. PMID: 29221955
Cited by
-
Marginal Bone Level and Clinical Parameter Analysis Comparing External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(9):1587. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091587. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174979 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Prosthetic intermediaries in oral implantology: Literature review].Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021 Jun 21;9(2):e064. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-0902-2021-064. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021. PMID: 38465276 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
-
Biomechanical efficiency of different implant-abutment connection: a systematic review of studies using photoelastic stress analysis.Evid Based Dent. 2023 Jun;24(2):92. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00884-6. Epub 2023 May 15. Evid Based Dent. 2023. PMID: 37188921
-
In vitro evaluation of the influence of bone cortical thickness on the primary stability of conventional- and short-sized implants.J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Feb 1;14(2):e138-e143. doi: 10.4317/jced.58886. eCollection 2022 Feb. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022. PMID: 35173896 Free PMC article.
-
Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):185. doi: 10.3390/dj11080185. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37623281 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources