Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital
- PMID: 27353286
- PMCID: PMC4971448
- DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016104
Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital
Abstract
Introduction: 72-hour emergency department (ED) reattendance is a widely-used quality indicator for quality of care and patient safety. It is generally assumed that patients who return within 72 hours of ED discharge (72-hour re-attendees) received inadequate treatment or evaluation. The current literature also suggests considerable variation in probable causes of 72-hour ED reattendances internationally. This study aimed to understand the characteristics of these patients at the ED of a Singapore tertiary hospital.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all ED visits between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. 72-hour re-attendees were compared against non-re-attendees based on patient demographics, mode of arrival, patient acuity category status (i.e. P1/P2/P3/P4), seniority ranking of doctor-in-charge and medical diagnoses. Multivariate analysis using the generalised linear model was conducted on variables associated with 72-hour ED re-attendance.
Results: Among 104,751 unique patients, 3,065 (2.93%) were in the 72-hour re-attendees group. Multivariate analysis showed that the following risk factors were associated with higher risk of returning within 72 hours: male gender, older age, arrival by ambulance, triaged as P2, diagnoses of heart problems, abdominal pain or viral infection (all p < 0.001), and Chinese ethnicity (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the seniority ranking of the doctor-in-charge between both groups (p = 0.419).
Conclusion: Several patient and event factors were associated with higher risk of being a 72-hour re-attendee. This study forms the basis for hypothesis generation and further studies to explore reasons behind reattendances so that interventions can be developed to target high-risk groups.
Keywords: 72-hour emergency department reattendance; 72-hour emergency department return; emergency department reattendance; emergency department return.
Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.
Figures
References
-
- Benbassat J, Taragin M. Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: advantages and limitations. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1074–81. - PubMed
-
- Ng CP, Chung CH. An analysis of unscheduled return visits to the accident and emergency department of a general public hospital. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2003;10:153–61.
-
- Wu CL, Wang FT, Chiang YC, et al. Unplanned emergency department revisits within 72 hours to a secondary teaching referral hospital in Taiwan. J Emerg Med. 2010;38:512–7. - PubMed
-
- Emergency Department and Quality Management Office, Changi General Hospital, Singapore. Re-Attendance at Emergency Department. Changi General Hospital, Singapore [online] [Accessed May 13 2016]. Available at: http://www.cgh.com.sg/Medical_Specialities/Clincal%20Outcomes/Pages/reat... .
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
