The journal Impact Factor and alternative metrics: A variety of bibliometric measures has been developed to supplant the Impact Factor to better assess the impact of individual research papers
- PMID: 27354417
- PMCID: PMC4967953
- DOI: 10.15252/embr.201642823
The journal Impact Factor and alternative metrics: A variety of bibliometric measures has been developed to supplant the Impact Factor to better assess the impact of individual research papers
Abstract
Even though the journal Impact Factor remains popular for research assessment, it is not suitable for measuring the impact or quality of individual research papers. A range of alternative metrics have been developed to better judge the quality of academic papers.
References
-
- Oswald AJ (2007) An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: evidence and implications for decision‐makers. Economica 74: 21–31
-
- Adler R, Ewing J, Taylor P, Hall PG (2009) A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). Stat Sci 24: 1–28
-
- Moed HF (2005) Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer;
-
- Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S, Rafols I (2015) Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520: 429–431 - PubMed
-
- Gonzalez‐Pereira B, Guerrero‐Bote VP, Moya‐Anegon F (2010) A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetr 4: 379–391
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
