Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i32-i37.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053079. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015

Affiliations

Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015

Hillary DeLong et al. Tob Control. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Native American tribes, as sovereign nations, are exempt from state tobacco excise taxation, and self-govern on-reservation activity in the USA. Under Federal law, state excise taxes are owed by non-members purchasing tobacco on tribal land, but states are limited in how they enforce or collect these taxes. This study highlights the various policy approaches that states have taken to regulate tobacco sales on tribal lands given jurisdictional challenges.

Methods: State laws (statutes, regulations and case law), Attorney General opinions, and revenue notices and rulings effective as of 1 January 2015 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia were compiled using Boolean searches in Lexis-Nexis and Westlaw. Laws were limited to those addressing taxation compacts or tobacco sales involving tribal entities. Master Settlement Agreement laws and non-codified tribal codes/compacts were excluded.

Results: Twenty of the 34 states with tribal lands address tribal tobacco sales. Fourteen states address intergovernmental compacts: 11 are tobacco specific, and suggest or require specific provisions. Fifteen states address tribal tax stamps: 2 explicitly prohibit stamping tribally sold products, 9 stamp all products, and 4 stamp some. Prepayment of excise tax is required in 12 states: 6 on all products, 4 on products in excess of quota, and 2 on products sold by non-tribal retailers. 6 states use quotas to limit tax-free tobacco available to tribes.

Conclusions: Many states with a tribal presence have no formal strategies for non-members purchasing tobacco on tribal lands. Formalising policies and harmonising tax rates may assist states in collecting tax revenue from non-tribal consumers.

Keywords: Price; Priority/special populations; Public policy; Taxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chaloupka FJ, Yurkeli AA, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control 2012;21:172–80. - PubMed
    1. Joossens L, Raw M. From Cigarette Smuggling to Illicit Tobacco Trade. Tob Control 2012;21:230–4. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050205 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Edwards S, Ross H, et al. Preventing and reducing illicit tobacco trade in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015. http://tobacconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Chaloupka_CDC_Illici... (accessed Mar 2016).
    1. World Health Organization. Technical manual on tobacco tax administration. Geneva, 2010.
    1. Gourdet CK, Chriqui JF, Leider J, et al. Tobacco product taxation: an analysis of state tax schemes nationwide, selected years, 2005–2014. Prepared for Tobacconomics, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2015.

Publication types