Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design
- PMID: 27354804
- PMCID: PMC4910682
- DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S101938
Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis for translating research data into clinical practice. This review summarizes commonly applied designs and quality indicators of RCTs to provide guidance in interpreting and critically evaluating clinical research data. It further reflects on the principle of equipoise and its practical applicability to clinical science with an emphasis on critical care and neurological research. We performed a review of educational material, review articles, methodological studies, and published clinical trials using the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most relevant recommendations regarding design, conduction, and reporting of RCTs may include the following: 1) clinically relevant end points should be defined a priori, and an unbiased analysis and report of the study results should be warranted, 2) both significant and nonsignificant results should be objectively reported and published, 3) structured study design and performance as indicated in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement should be employed as well as registration in a public trial database, 4) potential conflicts of interest and funding sources should be disclaimed in study report or publication, and 5) in the comparison of experimental treatment with standard care, preplanned interim analyses during an ongoing RCT can aid in maintaining clinical equipoise by assessing benefit, harm, or futility, thus allowing decision on continuation or termination of the trial.
Keywords: CONSORT; RCT; randomized clinical trials; study design; validity.
Figures

Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts-A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018 Jun;18(2):130-141.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 21. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018. PMID: 29747793
-
Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials: A survey of seven core journals of orthopaedics from Mainland China over 5 years following the CONSORT statement.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):933-938. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016. PMID: 27514437
-
Reporting quality of abstracts from randomised controlled trials published in leading critical care nursing journals: a methodological quality review.BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 15;13(3):e070639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070639. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36921935 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124(2):558-68. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS142465. Epub 2015 Aug 28. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26315006 Review.
Cited by
-
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections: An Evidence-Based Literature Review.SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 29;10:23779608241292839. doi: 10.1177/23779608241292839. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39493252 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effective cleaning of endoscopic lenses to achieve visual clarity for minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2382-2392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08519-6. Epub 2021 May 7. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 33963440 Free PMC article.
-
Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0223305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223305. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31581278 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of music-based interventions for cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 Aug 10;36(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00259-x. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023. PMID: 37561275 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence-based and mechanistic insights into exclusion diets for IBS.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;17(7):406-413. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0270-3. Epub 2020 Mar 2. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 32123377 Review.
References
-
- Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data. J Crit Care. 2006;21:1–7. - PubMed
-
- Reith C, Landray M, Devereaux PJ, et al. Randomized clinical trials – removing unnecessary obstacles. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1061–1065. - PubMed
-
- Berkman ND, Santaguida PL, Viswanathan M, et al. The Empirical Evidence of Bias in Trials Measuring Treatment Differences. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014. - PubMed
-
- Collins R, MacMahon S. Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials. Lancet. 2001;357:373–380. - PubMed
-
- Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical. Lancet. 2005;365:1348–1353. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical