Validation of Three Platelet Function Tests for Bleeding Risk Stratification During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Coronary Interventions
- PMID: 27355612
- PMCID: PMC6490783
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.22540
Validation of Three Platelet Function Tests for Bleeding Risk Stratification During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Coronary Interventions
Abstract
Background: Although low platelet reactivity (LPR) is commonly detected during bleeding, a validated threshold for reliable DAPT bleeding risk stratification is lacking. We tested the diagnostic utility of 3 conventional platelet-activity assays to define the predictive value (if any) of LPR for bleeding.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized whether one of these tests be better than any others for predicting bleeding events.
Methods: Patients (n = 800) following drug-eluting stent implantation received DAPT. Bleeding was assessed by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification and events were collected for 1 year after stenting. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). The LPR values for bleeding event stratification were defined as ≤15% for LTA, ≤139 PRU for VerifyNow, and ≤25 U for MEA.
Results: Bleeding events occurred in 18 patients (2.3%). All tests distinguished LPR as an independent predictor for bleeding by univariate analysis ([HR]: 5.00, 95% [CI]: 1.8-14.0, P = 0.002 for LTA; HR: 21.3, 95% CI: 6.2-73.0, P < 0.0001 for VerifyNow; and HR: 7.4, 95% CI: 2.2-25.5, P = 0.002 for MEA). Multivariate analysis revealed that only VerifyNow (HR: 11.5, 95% CI: 2.9-45.7, P < 0.0004) remained an independent predictor for bleeding. However, the specificity (81.5%, 60.2%, and 81.7%, respectively) and sensitivity (61.1%, 83.3%, and 83.2%, respectively) of all 3 tests were quite low.
Conclusions: Among 3 conventional platelet-activity assays, VerifyNow was better than LTA or MEA for triaging future bleeding risks. However, all 3 tests failed to reliably predict future bleeding.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The challenge for predicting bleeding events by assessing platelet reactivity following coronary stenting.Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;207:128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.102. Epub 2016 Jan 7. Int J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26800135
-
A therapeutic window for platelet reactivity for patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-PROVE (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity for Outcome Validation Effort) study.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar;5(3):281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.009. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22440493
-
Comparison of Three Tests to Distinguish Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Renal Impairment during Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.Nephron. 2016;132(3):191-7. doi: 10.1159/000444027. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Nephron. 2016. PMID: 26914786
-
Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2261-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101. Epub 2013 Sep 27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24076493
-
Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention.Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1762-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv104. Epub 2015 Apr 20. Eur Heart J. 2015. PMID: 25896078 Review.
Cited by
-
Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System Predicts Periprocedural Bleeding Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 24;6(4):e005263. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005263. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28438734 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents implantation (PAINT-DES): a prospective, propensity score-matched cohort study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 24;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0841-1. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018. PMID: 29793432 Free PMC article.
-
Symmetric Dimethylarginine is Altered in Patients After Myocardial Infarction and Predicts Adverse Outcomes.J Inflamm Res. 2021 Aug 10;14:3797-3808. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S316078. eCollection 2021. J Inflamm Res. 2021. PMID: 34408463 Free PMC article.
-
Implication of Platelets in Immuno-Thrombosis and Thrombo-Inflammation.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 25;9:863846. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863846. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35402556 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–2619. - PubMed
-
- Montalescot G, Brieger D, Dalby AJ, et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting: a review of the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:832–847. - PubMed
-
- Steg PG, Huber K, Andreotti F, et al. Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1854–1864. - PubMed
-
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research . NDA 204–886. Medical reviews on Vorapaxar. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2014/204886Orig1s000MedR.pdf. Published April 25, 2014. Accessed May 15, 2015.
-
- Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al; TRITON‐TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–2015. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical