Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;13(8):481-92.
doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.96. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

Management of refractory cardiogenic shock

Affiliations
Review

Management of refractory cardiogenic shock

Alex Reyentovich et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition that occurs in response to reduced cardiac output in the presence of adequate intravascular volume and results in tissue hypoxia. Cardiogenic shock has several underlying aetiologies, with the most common being acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Refractory cardiogenic shock presents as persistent tissue hypoperfusion despite administration of adequate doses of two vasoactive medications and treatment of the underlying aetiology. Investigators of the SHOCK trial reported a long-term mortality benefit of emergency revascularization for shock complicating AMI. Since the publication of the SHOCK trial and subsequent guideline recommendations, the increase in community-based use of percutaneous coronary intervention for this condition has resulted in a significant decline in mortality. Despite these successes in the past 15 years, mortality still remains exceptionally high, particularly in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. In this Review, we discuss the aetiology and pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock and summarize the data on the available therapeutics and their limitations. Although new mechanical circulatory support devices have been shown to improve haemodynamic variables in patients with shock complicating AMI, they did not improve clinical outcomes and are associated with high costs and complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1110-6 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 2013 May;165(5):679-92 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):981-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1973 May 10;288(19):979-84 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1584-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances