Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;74(4):379-403.
doi: 10.1177/1077558716654631. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review

Ajay Aggarwal  1 , Daniel Lewis  1 , Malcolm Mason  2 , Richard Sullivan  3 , Jan van der Meulen  1
Affiliations

Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review

Ajay Aggarwal et al. Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Our review establishes the empirical evidence for patient mobility for elective secondary care services in countries that allow patients to choose their health care provider. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles between 1990 and 2015. Of 5,994 titles/abstracts reviewed, 26 studies were included. The studies used three main methodological models to establish mobility. Variation in the extent of patient mobility was observed across the studies. Mobility was positively associated with lower waiting times, indicators of better service quality, and access to advanced technology. It was negatively associated with advanced age or lower socioeconomic backgrounds. From a policy perspective we demonstrate that a significant proportion of patients are prepared to travel beyond their nearest provider for elective services. As a consequence, some providers are likely to be "winners" and others "losers," which could result in overall decreased provider capacity or inefficient utilization of existing services. Equity also remains a key concern.

Keywords: hospital bypassing; patient choice; patient mobility; provider competition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of study selection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Balia S., Brau R., Marrocu E. (2014). What drives patient mobility across Italian regions? Evidence from hospital discharge data. Developments in Health Economics and Public Policy, 12, 133-154. - PubMed
    1. Basu J. (2005). Severity of illness, race, and choice of local versus distant hospitals among the elderly. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 16, 391-405. - PubMed
    1. Beckert W., Christensen M., Collyer K. (2012). Choice of NHS-funded Hospital Services in England. Economic Journal, 122, 400-417. Doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02496.x - DOI
    1. Berwick D. M., James B., Coye M. J. (2003). Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Medical Care, 41(Suppl. 1), I-30-I-38. - PubMed
    1. Beukers P. D., Kemp R. G., Varkevisser M. (2014). Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: Empirical evidence from the Netherlands. European Journal of Health Economics, 15, 927-936. Doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0535-7 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types