Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;135(1):61-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

The impact of joint partner decision making on obstetric choices and outcomes among Malawian women

Nisha Rao  1 , Allahna Esber  2 , Abigail Turner  3 , Joseph Chilewani  4 , Venson Banda  4 , Alison Norris  3
Affiliations

The impact of joint partner decision making on obstetric choices and outcomes among Malawian women

Nisha Rao et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of joint partner decision making on obstetric choices and outcomes in Malawi.

Methods: Between July 15, 2014 and February 25, 2015, interviews were performed with women who reported at least one lifetime pregnancy in Lilongwe District, Malawi as part of a cross-sectional study of reproductive decision making. Logistic regression models were applied to examine associations of joint decision making with delivery location and obstetric complications.

Results: The study population included 860 women. Women who engaged in joint decision making with partners (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-7.2) and women whose partners made obstetric-care decisions alone (aOR 3.2; 95% CI 2.4-4.4) were more likely to undergo delivery at a healthcare facility compared with women who made obstetric-care decisions individually. In comparison with women who made obstetric decisions individually, no difference in the likelihood of experiencing obstetric complications was observed for women who engaged in joint decision making (aOR 1.1; 95% CI 0.7-1.7) or for women whose partners made decisions individually (aOR 0.8; 95% CI 0.5-1.3).

Conclusion: In rural Malawi, partner involvement in obstetric decision making was associated with improved obstetric choices.

Keywords: Birthweight; Facility delivery; Joint decision making; Malawi; Obstetric complications; Partner decision making; Skilled birth assistant; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. World Health Organization. [Accessed September 29, 2015];Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013 Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division Executive Summary. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112697/1/WHO_RHR_14.13_eng.pdf?.... Published 2014.
    1. Wilunda C, Putoto G, Dalla Riva D, Manenti F, Atzori A, Calia F, et al. Assessing coverage, equity and quality gaps in maternal and neonatal care in sub-saharan Africa: an integrated approach. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(3):244–60. - PubMed
    1. Gabrysch S, Campbell OM. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanc AK. The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;32(3):189–213. - PubMed