Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989;10(1):25-8.
doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(89)90143-9.

Effect of (Asu1,7)-eel calcitonin on the prevention of osteoporosis induced by combination of immobilization and ovariectomy in the rat

Affiliations

Effect of (Asu1,7)-eel calcitonin on the prevention of osteoporosis induced by combination of immobilization and ovariectomy in the rat

T Hayashi et al. Bone. 1989.

Abstract

Experimental osteoporosis was induced in the rat by a combination of ovariectomy and immobilization by hemicordotomy. (Asu1,7)-eel calcitonin (CT) was administered at doses of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 MRC unit/kg, and its preventive effect on bone loss was examined. Significant bone loss was observed in the untreated control group by photo-densitometry and measurement of bone mass. CT at doses of above 1.0 MRC unit/kg significantly increased femur scores and at doses of above 2.5 MRC unit/kg resulted in significantly higher photodensity. Dry weight and ash weight were significantly higher in the 2.5 and 5.0 MRC unit/kg CT-treated groups. Administration of CT had a nearly dose-dependent effect on bone mass. Histomorphometry revealed significantly lower fractional formation surface and fractional resorption surface in the 5.0 MRC unit/kg CT-treated group. Bone mineralization was studied by the quantitative analysis of tetracycline incorporation. Tetracycline uptake was significantly lower in the groups treated with CT at doses above 1.0 MRC unit/kg. The kinetic bone formation activity studied by 45Ca and 14C-proline tracer examination, in the 5.0 MRC unit/kg CT-treated group was significantly lower than that in the control group, but not lower than that in the sham-operated group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources