A Comprehensive View of Frequent Emergency Department Users Based on Data from a Regional HIE
- PMID: 27364030
- PMCID: PMC4933324
- DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000488
A Comprehensive View of Frequent Emergency Department Users Based on Data from a Regional HIE
Abstract
Objectives: A small but significant number of patients make frequent emergency department (ED) visits to multiple EDs within a region. We have a unique health information exchange (HIE) that includes every ED encounter in all hospital systems in our region. Using our HIE we were able to characterize all frequent ED users in our region, regardless of hospital visited or payer class. The objective of our study was to use data from an HIE to characterize patients in a region who are frequent ED users (FEDUs).
Methods: We constructed a database from a cohort of adult patients (18 years old or older) with information in a regional HIE for a 1-year period beginning in April 2012. Patients were defined as FEDUs (those who made four or more visits during the study period) and non-FEDUs (those who made fewer than four ED visits during the study period). Predictor variables included age, race, sex, payer class, county of residence, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Bivariate (χ(2)) and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses were performed to determine associations between predictor variables and the outcome of being a FEDU.
Results: The database contained 127,672 patients, 12,293 (9.6%) of whom were FEDUs. Logistic regression showed the following patient characteristics to be significantly associated with the outcome of being a FEDU: age 35 to 44 years; African American race; Medicaid, Medicare, and dual-pay payer class; and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 630 to 679 (complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium), 780 to 799 (ill-defined conditions), 280 to 289 (diseases of the blood), 290-319 (mental disorders), 680 to 709 (diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue), 710 to 739 (musculoskeletal and connective tissue disease), 460 to 519 (respiratory disease), and 520 to 579 (digestive disease). No significant differences were noted between men and women.
Conclusions: Data from an HIE can be used to describe all of the patients within a region who are FEDUs, regardless of the hospital system they visited. This information can be used to focus care coordination efforts and link appropriate patients to a medical home. Future studies can be designed to learn the reasons why patients become FEDUs, and interventions can be developed to address deficiencies in health care that result in frequent ED visits.
Conflict of interest statement
The remaining authors have no financial relationships to disclose and no conflicts of interest to report.
Figures
Similar articles
-
When Should ED Physicians Use an HIE? Predicting Presence of Patient Data in an HIE.South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):427-33. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000490. South Med J. 2016. PMID: 27364029 Free PMC article.
-
Increased Identification of Emergency Department 72-hour Returns Using Multihospital Health Information Exchange.Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):645-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12954. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Acad Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 26932394
-
Characteristics and predictors of adult frequent emergency department users in the United States: A systematic literature review.J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):420-433. doi: 10.1111/jep.13137. Epub 2019 May 2. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019. PMID: 31044484
-
Health Information Exchange in the ED: What Do ED Clinicians Think?South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):419-26. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000466. South Med J. 2016. PMID: 27364028 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31129592 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department.BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00970-7. BMC Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38539107 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency Department Utilization among Underserved African American Older Adults in South Los Angeles.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 2;16(7):1175. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071175. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30986915 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships Between Race/Ethnicity and Health Care Utilization Among Older Post-Acute Home Health Care Patients.J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Feb;39(2):201-213. doi: 10.1177/0733464818758453. Epub 2018 Feb 19. J Appl Gerontol. 2020. PMID: 29457521 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4239-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31277649 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of social determinants of health and structural competency training in global emergency medicine fellowship programs in the United States.AEM Educ Train. 2021 Sep 29;5(Suppl 1):S28-S32. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10660. eCollection 2021 Sep. AEM Educ Train. 2021. PMID: 34616970 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2011 emergency department summary. FastStats; 2011.
-
- LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:42–48. - PubMed
-
- Fuda KK, Immekus R. Frequent users of Massachusetts emergency departments: a statewide analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:9–16. - PubMed
-
- Hunt KA, Weber EJ, Showstack JA, et al. Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:1–8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous