Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;31(11):1308-1314.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3787-y.

Receipt of Cancer Screening Is a Predictor of Life Expectancy

Affiliations

Receipt of Cancer Screening Is a Predictor of Life Expectancy

James S Goodwin et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Obtaining cancer screening on patients with limited life expectancy has been proposed as a measure for low quality care for primary care physicians (PCPs). However, administrative data may underestimate life expectancy in patients who undergo screening.

Objective: To determine the association between receipt of screening mammography or PSA and overall survival.

Design: Retrospective cohort study from 1/1/1999 to 12/31/2012. Receipt of screening was assessed for 2001-2002 and survival from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2012. Life expectancy was estimated as of 1/1/03 using a validated algorithm, and was compared to actual survival for men and women, stratified by receipt of cancer screening.

Participants: A 5 % sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 69-90 years as of 1/1/2003 (n = 906,723).

Interventions: Receipt of screening mammography in 2001-2002 for women, or a screening PSA test in 2002 for men.

Main measures: Survival from 1/1/2003 through 12/31/2012.

Key results: Subjects were stratified by life expectancy based on age and comorbidity. Within each stratum, the subjects with prior cancer screening had actual median survivals higher than those who were not screened, with differences ranging from 1.7 to 2.1 years for women and 0.9 to 1.1 years for men. In a Cox model, non-receipt of screening in women had an impact on survival (HR = 1.52; 95 % CI = 1.51, 1.54) similar in magnitude to a diagnosis of complicated diabetes or heart failure, and was comparable to uncomplicated diabetes or liver disease in men (HR = 1.23; 1.22, 1.25).

Conclusions: Receipt of cancer screening is a powerful marker of health status that is not captured by comorbidity measures in administrative data. Because life expectancy algorithms using administrative data underestimate the life expectancy of patients who undergo screening, they can overestimate the problem of cancer screening in patients with limited life expectancy.

Keywords: cancer; life expectancy; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards Funders This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P30-AG024832, UL1TR000071 and KO5 CA 134923), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R24HS022134), and the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RP101207). The sponsors played no role in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, or in determining where to send the manuscript for publication. Prior Presentations None. Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Actual survival among Medicare enrollees aged 69 to 90, stratified by whether they had received cancer screening and by estimated life expectancy, and adjusted for age, race, Medicaid eligibility, and comorbidities. a Screening mammography in women. b Screening PSA in men.

Comment in

References

    1. Cassel CK, Guest JA. Choosing wisely. Helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA. 2012;307(17):1801–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.476. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee SJ, Walter LC. Quality indicators for older adults: preventing unintended harms. JAMA. 2011;306:1481–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1418. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathias JS, Baker DW. Developing quality measures to address overuse. JAMA. 2013;309:1897–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3588. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwartz AL, Landon BE, Elshaug AG, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM. Measuring low-value care in medicare. JAMA Int Med. 2014;174:1067–76. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1541. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho C, Klabunde CN, Yabroff KR, et al. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: a new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:667–76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00005. - DOI - PubMed