Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;47(1):113-126.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7.

Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review

Lowri C Edwards et al. Sports Med. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years-being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently.

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature.

Methods: Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance.

Conclusions: Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards Funding No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. Conflict of interest Lowri C. Edwards, Anna S. Bryant, Richard J. Keegan, Kevin Morgan and Anwen M. Jones declare that they have no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram showing the process of study identification and selection [46]. PRISMA preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

References

    1. Delaney B, Donnelly P, News J, et al. Improving physical literacy. Belfast: Sport Northern Ireland; 2008.
    1. Higgs C, Balyi I, Way R, et al. Developing physical literacy: a guide for parents of children ages 0 to 12. Vancouver: Canadian Sport Centres; 2008.
    1. Mandigo J, Francis N, Lodewyk K, et al. Physical literacy for educators. Phys Health Educ. 2009;75(3):27–30.
    1. Keegan RJ, Keegan SL, Daley S, et al. Getting Australia moving: establishing a physically literate and active nation (game plan) Canberra: University of Canberra; 2013.
    1. Youth Sport Trust . Primary school physical literacy framework. Loughborough: Youth Sport Trust; 2013.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources