Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;51(9):1275-84.
doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1257-9. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

Service user experiences of REFOCUS: a process evaluation of a pro-recovery complex intervention

Affiliations

Service user experiences of REFOCUS: a process evaluation of a pro-recovery complex intervention

Genevieve Wallace et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Policy is increasingly focused on implementing a recovery-orientation within mental health services, yet the subjective experience of individuals receiving a pro-recovery intervention is under-studied. The aim of this study was to explore the service user experience of receiving a complex, pro-recovery intervention (REFOCUS), which aimed to encourage the use of recovery-supporting tools and support recovery-promoting relationships.

Methods: Interviews (n = 24) and two focus groups (n = 13) were conducted as part of a process evaluation and included a purposive sample of service users who received the complex, pro-recovery intervention within the REFOCUS randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN02507940). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results: Participants reported that the intervention supported the development of an open and collaborative relationship with staff, with new conversations around values, strengths and goals. This was experienced as hope-inspiring and empowering. However, others described how the recovery tools were used without context, meaning participants were unclear of their purpose and did not see their benefit. During the interviews, some individuals struggled to report any new tasks or conversations occurring during the intervention.

Conclusion: Recovery-supporting tools can support the development of a recovery-promoting relationship, which can contribute to positive outcomes for individuals. The tools should be used in a collaborative and flexible manner. Information exchanged around values, strengths and goals should be used in care-planning. As some service users struggled to report their experience of the intervention, alternative evaluation approaches need to be considered if the service user experience is to be fully captured.

Keywords: Complex intervention; Health service and population research; Process evaluation; Recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;24(1):5-10 - PubMed
    1. J Ment Health. 2012 Dec;21(6):539-47 - PubMed
    1. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;45(4):267-80 - PubMed
    1. Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52 - PubMed
    1. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;47(7):609-10 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources