Service user experiences of REFOCUS: a process evaluation of a pro-recovery complex intervention
- PMID: 27365099
- DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1257-9
Service user experiences of REFOCUS: a process evaluation of a pro-recovery complex intervention
Abstract
Purpose: Policy is increasingly focused on implementing a recovery-orientation within mental health services, yet the subjective experience of individuals receiving a pro-recovery intervention is under-studied. The aim of this study was to explore the service user experience of receiving a complex, pro-recovery intervention (REFOCUS), which aimed to encourage the use of recovery-supporting tools and support recovery-promoting relationships.
Methods: Interviews (n = 24) and two focus groups (n = 13) were conducted as part of a process evaluation and included a purposive sample of service users who received the complex, pro-recovery intervention within the REFOCUS randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN02507940). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
Results: Participants reported that the intervention supported the development of an open and collaborative relationship with staff, with new conversations around values, strengths and goals. This was experienced as hope-inspiring and empowering. However, others described how the recovery tools were used without context, meaning participants were unclear of their purpose and did not see their benefit. During the interviews, some individuals struggled to report any new tasks or conversations occurring during the intervention.
Conclusion: Recovery-supporting tools can support the development of a recovery-promoting relationship, which can contribute to positive outcomes for individuals. The tools should be used in a collaborative and flexible manner. Information exchanged around values, strengths and goals should be used in care-planning. As some service users struggled to report their experience of the intervention, alternative evaluation approaches need to be considered if the service user experience is to be fully captured.
Keywords: Complex intervention; Health service and population research; Process evaluation; Recovery.
Similar articles
-
REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams.BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 23;11:185. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-185. BMC Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 22112008 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
'Recovery' in the Real World: Service User Experiences of Mental Health Service Use and Recommendations for Change 20 Years on from a First Episode Psychosis.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jul;45(4):635-648. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0851-4. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018. PMID: 29411173 Free PMC article.
-
Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery.Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;207(6):544-50. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.155978. Epub 2015 Oct 8. Br J Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26450586 Review.
-
Collaborative care intervention for individuals with severe mental illness: the PARTNERS2 programme including complex intervention development and cluster RCT.Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2024 Jul. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2024 Jul. PMID: 39074216 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Supporting recovery in patients with psychosis through care by community-based adult mental health teams (REFOCUS): a multisite, cluster, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;2(6):503-14. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00086-3. Epub 2015 May 27. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26360446 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Implementing an intervention designed to enhance service user involvement in mental health care planning: a qualitative process evaluation.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;54(2):221-233. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1603-1. Epub 2018 Sep 28. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30267112 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of Jointly Using an e-Mental Health Resource (Self-Management And Recovery Technology) on Interactions Between Service Users Experiencing Severe Mental Illness and Community Mental Health Workers: Grounded Theory Study.JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jun 16;8(6):e25998. doi: 10.2196/25998. JMIR Ment Health. 2021. PMID: 34132647 Free PMC article.
-
The processes involved in the establishment of user-provider partnerships in severe psychiatric illnesses: a scoping review.BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04303-5. BMC Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36289473 Free PMC article.
-
Provision of a Multidisciplinary Post-Suicidal, Community-Based Aftercare Program: A Longitudinal Study.Community Ment Health J. 2023 May;59(4):680-691. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01051-4. Epub 2022 Nov 14. Community Ment Health J. 2023. PMID: 36374379
-
Consumer Views and Experiences of Secondary-Care Services Following REFOCUS-PULSAR Staff Recovery-Oriented Practices Training.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 20;20(10):5894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105894. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37239620 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials