Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 28;8(18):770-8.
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.770.

Transarterial radioembolization vs chemoembolization for hepatocarcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Transarterial radioembolization vs chemoembolization for hepatocarcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antonio Facciorusso et al. World J Hepatol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y90RE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Methods: Bibliographic research was conducted on main scientific databases. When there was no statistically significant heterogeneity, pooled effects were calculated using a fixed-effects model by means of Mantel-Haenszel test, otherwise, a random-effects model was used with DerSimonian and Laird test. Summary estimates were expressed in terms of odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CI. The probability of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and with Begg and Mazumdar's test. Sensitivity analysis was finally conducted using the method of excluding extreme data.

Results: A total of 10 studies were analyzed, of which 2 randomized controlled trials. Survival rate (SR) assessed at 1 year showed an absolute similarity between the two treatment groups (OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.78-1.31, P = 0.93). As long as time elapsed since the treatment, ORs for survival rate tended to significantly increase, thus meaning better long-term outcomes in patients who underwent Y90RE (2-year SR: OR = 1.43, 1.08-1.89, P = 0.01; 3-year SR: OR = 1.48, 1.03-2.13, P = 0.04). Meta-analysis of plotted hazard ratios (HRs) determined a non-significant overall estimate in favor of Y90RE (HR = 0.91, 0.80-1.04, P = 0.16). Y90RE showed a statistically significant benefit as compared to TACE in terms of higher progression-free survival rate assessed at 1 year (OR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.10-2.55; P = 0.02). Pooled analyses do not revealed a statistically significant increase in OR for tumor objective responses after Y90RE with respect to TACE (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 0.69-2.16, P = 0.50). A non-significant trend in favor of Y90RE was observed according to adverse event rate (OR = 0.70, 0.38-1.30, P = 0.26).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis reveals that Y90RE and TACE show similar effects in terms of survival, response rate and safety profile, although tumor progression is delayed after radioembolization.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognosis; Recurrence; Survival; Transarterial chemoembolization; Yttrium-90 radioembolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart summarizing study selection. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization; Y90RE: Yttrium-90 radioembolization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of hazard ratios for overall survival after yttrium-90 radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization. Overall estimate was non-significantly in favor of Y90RE (HR = 0.91, 0.80-1.04, P = 0.16). There was only a low level of heterogeneity among studies [χ2 = 7.32, df = 6 (P = 0.29), I2 = 18%)]. Y90RE: Yttrium-90 radioembolization; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization; HR: Hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot for detection of publication bias with regard to overall survival. No evidence of publication bias was detected. HR: Hazard ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for 1-year progression-free survival after yttrium-90 radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization. Y90RE showed a statistically significant benefit in terms of higher progression-free survival rate assessed at 1 year (OR = 1.67, 1.10-2.55, P = 0.02). There was no evidence of heterogeneity among individual studies (P = 0.66; I2 = 0%). Y90RE: Yttrium-90 radioembolization; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization; OR: Odds ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot for objective response rate after yttrium-90 radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization. Pooled analyses do not revealed a statistically significant increase in odds ratio for tumor objective responses after Y90RE with respect to TACE (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 0.69-2.16, P = 0.50). There was, however, evidence of heterogeneity across these studies (P = 0.004; I² = 67%), mainly due to some outlier studies. Y90RE: Yttrium-90 radioembolization; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization; OR: Odds ratio.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot for serious adverse event rate after yttrium-90 radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization. A non-significant trend in favor of Y90RE was observed (OR = 0.70, 0.38-1.30, P = 0.26), but with a high evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 52%; P = 0.05). Y90RE: Yttrium-90 radioembolization; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization; OR: Odds ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–1127. - PubMed
    1. European Association For The Study Of The Liver; European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908–943. - PubMed
    1. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Novel advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008. J Hepatol. 2008;48 Suppl 1:S20–S37. - PubMed
    1. Facciorusso A, Licinio R, Muscatiello N, Di Leo A, Barone M. Transarterial chemoembolization: Evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:2009–2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Sangro B. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32:348–359. - PubMed