Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016:2016:3624730.
doi: 10.1155/2016/3624730. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

Assessment of Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Copeptin in the Clinical Setting of Sepsis

Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessment of Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Copeptin in the Clinical Setting of Sepsis

Stefania Battista et al. Biomed Res Int. 2016.

Abstract

The diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of copeptin were evaluated in septic patients, as compared to procalcitonin assessment. In this single centre and observational study 105 patients were enrolled: 24 with sepsis, 25 with severe sepsis, 15 with septic shock, and 41 controls, divided in two subgroups (15 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and 26 with suspected SIRS secondary to trauma, acute coronary syndrome, and pulmonary embolism). Biomarkers were determined at the first medical evaluation and thereafter 24, 48, and 72 hours after admission. Definitive diagnosis and in-hospital survival rates at 30 days were obtained through analysis of medical records. At entry, copeptin proved to be able to distinguish cases from controls and also sepsis group from septic shock group, while procalcitonin could distinguish also severe sepsis from septic shock group. Areas under the ROC curve for copeptin and procalcitonin were 0.845 and 0.861, respectively. Noteworthy, patients with copeptin concentrations higher than the threshold value (23.2 pmol/L), calculated from the ROC curve, at admission presented higher 30-day mortality. No significant differences were found in copeptin temporal profile among different subgroups. Copeptin showed promising diagnostic and prognostic role in the management of sepsis, together with its possible role in monitoring the response to treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of copeptin concentrations obtained at admission (T0) in the studied groups. Box-and-whisker plot represents median, first, and third quartile, as well as minimum and maximum values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations measured at entry (T0) in the studied groups. Box-and-whisker plot represents median, first, and third quartile, as well as minimum and maximum values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between ROC curves obtained for copeptin and procalcitonin (PCT) on samples collected at the admission to the Emergency Department.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier survival curves related to copeptin concentrations at admission to the Emergency Department. A: patients with initial copeptin concentrations higher than 23.2 pmol/L; B: patients with copeptin concentrations at entry lower than 23.2 pmol/L.

References

    1. Mayr F. B., Yende S., Angus D. C. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5(1):4–11. doi: 10.4161/viru.27372. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin G. S. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy. 2012;10(6):701–706. doi: 10.1586/eri.12.50. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dellinger R. P., Levy M. M., Rhodes A., et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical Care Medicine. 2013;41580637 - PubMed
    1. Cabrera J. L., Pinsky M. R. Management of septic shock: a protocol-less approach. Critical Care. 2015;19:260–264. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0968-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The ARISE Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(16):1496–1506. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1404380. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types