Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;87(1):82-87.
doi: 10.2319/032416-241.1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatment

Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatment

Isil Aras et al. Angle Orthod. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To compare two groups of subjects at the peak of the pubertal growth period treated with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA; Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) appliance using either single-step or stepwise mandibular advancement.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted on 34 Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects at or just before the peak phase of pubertal growth as assessed by hand-wrist radiographs. Subjects were assigned to two groups of mandibular advancement, using matched randomization. Both groups were treated with the FMA. While the mandible was advanced to a super Class I molar relation in the single-step advancement group (SSG), patients in the stepwise mandibular advancement group (SWG) had a 4-mm initial bite advancement and subsequent 2-mm advancements at bimonthly intervals. The material consisted of lateral cephalograms taken before treatment and after 10 months of FMA treatment. Data were analyzed by means paired t-tests and an independent t-test.

Results: There were statistically significant changes in SNB, Pg horizontal, ANB, Co-Gn, and Co-Go measurements in both groups (P < .001); these changes were greater in the SWG with the exception of Co-Go (P < .05). While significant differences were found in U1-SN, IMPA, L6 horizontal, overjet, and overbite appraisals in each group (P < .001), these changes were comparable (P > .05).

Conclusion: Because of the higher rates of sagittal mandibular skeletal changes, FMA using stepwise advancement of the mandible might be the appliance of choice for treating Class II division 1 malocclusions.

Keywords: Angle Class II; Functional orthodontic appliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Application of Functional Mandibular Advancer.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Skeletal and dental cephalometric measurements: (1) SNA angle; (2) SNB angle; (3) ANB angle; (4) N-ANS on FH (ANS horizontal); (5) N-Pg on FH (Pg horizontal); (6) Co-Gn; (7) Co-Go; (8) SN-GoGn angle; (9) Ar-Go-Me angle; (10) U1-SN angle; (11) IMPA; (12) U6-vertical; (13) U6-horizontal; (14) L6-vertical; (15) L6-horizontal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hagg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:169–176. - PubMed
    1. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA., Jr Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:599.e1–e12. - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Zhu Y, Long H, et al. The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015 doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv057. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:239–246. - PubMed
    1. Kinzinger G, Diedrich P. Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)? J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:469–490. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources