Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;95(26):e3982.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003982.

Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic resection of right-sided colon cancer by complete mesocolic excision

Affiliations

Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic resection of right-sided colon cancer by complete mesocolic excision

Chang Woo Kim et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is cosmetically beneficial, but technically challenging. In this study, the learning curve (LC) for single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SILRC), incorporating complete mesocolic excision to resect right-sided colon cancer, was investigated through multidimensional techniques. Between December 2009 and May 2015, 64 patients each underwent SILRC of right-sided colon cancer at Severance Hospital, performed in all instances by the same surgeon. Moving average and cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) were used for LC analyses retrospectively. Surgical failure was defined as conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery, postsurgical morbidity within 30 days, harvested lymph node count <12, or local tumor recurrence. Both moving average and CUSUM graphics of operative time registered nadirs at the 24th patient, with slight ascent thereafter, reaching a plateau at the 40th patient. The CUSUM for surgical success peaked at the 23rd patient. Operative time for 23 patients in phase 1 (1-23) and for 41 patients in phase 2 (24-64) of the LC did not differ significantly. By comparison, significant differences in patients of phase 2 included larger tumor size, higher harvested lymph node counts, longer proximal resection margins, and more advanced disease. As indicated by multidimensional statistical analyses, the LC for SILRC of right-sided colon cancer was 23 patients. In terms of operative time and surgical success, SILRC is feasible for surgeons experienced in LS, but may prove more challenging for novices, given the fundamental technical difficulties of this procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Moving average method for operative time: nadir at 24th patient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CUSUM for operative time: nadir at 24th patient. CUSUM = cumulative sum control chart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CUSUM for surgical success: peak at 23rd patient. CUSUM = cumulative sum control chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97:1638–1645. - PubMed
    1. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:637–645. - PubMed
    1. Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 2012; 256:915–919. - PubMed
    1. Kadar N, Reich H, Liu CY, et al. Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:1493–1495. - PubMed
    1. Marcovici I. Significant abdominal wall hematoma from an umbilical port insertion. JSLS 2001; 5:293–295. - PMC - PubMed