Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;24(1):64-67.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1075-9.

How can we detect when language emerged?

Affiliations

How can we detect when language emerged?

Ian Tattersall. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Views differ radically as to how deep the roots of language lie in human phylogeny, largely because prior to the development of writing systems, this striking human attribute has to be inferred from indirect proxies preserved in the material record. Here I argue that the most appropriate such archaeological proxies encode the modern human symbolic cognitive system from which language emerges. Throughout the 2.5 million years or more for which an archaeological record has existed, change has been both sporadic and rare-until symbolic objects and behaviors begin to appear, well within the tenure of our highly apomorphic species Homo sapiens. I propose that the biology underwriting our unusual cognitive and linguistic systems was acquired in the major developmental reorganization that gave rise to our anatomically distinctive species around 200,000 years ago in Africa. However, the material record indicates that this new potential lay fallow for around 100,000 years, following which it was released by what was necessarily a behavioral stimulus. By far the best candidate for that stimulus is the spontaneous invention of language, which is plausibly underwritten by a relatively simple mental algorithm, and could readily have spurred symbolic cognitive processes in a feedback process. None of this means that earlier hominid vocal communication systems were not complex, or that extinct hominid species were not highly intelligent. But it does emphasize the qualitative distinctiveness of both modern symbolic cognition and language.

Keywords: Language evolution; Origin of Homo sapiens; Speech evolution; Symbolic cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 05;4:397 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0119802 - PubMed
    1. Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 6;17(21):1908-12 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 23;107(47):20234-9 - PubMed
    1. J Hum Evol. 2010 Nov;59(5):586-93 - PubMed