Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Oct;21(10):1165-1175.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

Palbociclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analysis From a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study (PALOMA-3)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Palbociclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analysis From a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study (PALOMA-3)

Sunil Verma et al. Oncologist. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Palbociclib enhances endocrine therapy and improves clinical outcomes in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Because this is a new target, it is clinically important to understand palbociclib's safety profile to effectively manage toxicity and optimize clinical benefit.

Materials and methods: Patients with endocrine-resistant, HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC (n = 521) were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection) with or without goserelin with oral palbociclib (125 mg daily; 3 weeks on/1 week off) or placebo. Safety assessments at baseline and day 1 of each cycle included blood counts on day 15 for the first 2 cycles. Hematologic toxicity was assessed by using laboratory data.

Results: A total of 517 patients were treated (palbociclib, n = 345; placebo, n = 172); median follow-up was 8.9 months. With palbociclib, neutropenia was the most common grade 3 (55%) and 4 (10%) adverse event; median times to onset and duration of grade ≥3 episodes were 16 and 7 days, respectively. Asian ethnicity and below-median neutrophil counts at baseline were significantly associated with an increased chance of developing grade 3-4 neutropenia with palbociclib. Dose modifications for grade 3-4 neutropenia had no adverse effect on progression-free survival. In the palbociclib arm, febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 (<1%) patients. The percentage of grade 1-2 infections was higher than in the placebo arm. Grade 1 stomatitis occurred in 8% of patients.

Conclusion: Palbociclib plus fulvestrant treatment was well-tolerated, and the primary toxicity of asymptomatic neutropenia was effectively managed by dose modification without apparent loss of efficacy. This study appears at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942135.

Implications for practice: Treatment with palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant was generally safe and well-tolerated in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Consistent with the drug's proposed mechanism of action, palbociclib-related neutropenia differs in its clinical time course, patterns, and consequences from those seen with chemotherapy. Neutropenia can be effectively managed by a dose reduction, interruption, or cycle delay without compromising efficacy. A significant efficacy gain and a favorable safety profile support the consideration of incorporating palbociclib into the routine management of HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Keywords: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4; Cyclin-dependent kinase 6; Neutropenia; Palbociclib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Palbociclib/placebo dose modification schema for managing treatment-related toxicities. aIf patients still have not returned to grade 2 on day 1 of next cycle. bReduce by 2 dose levels. cIf uncomplicated grade 3 neutropenia recurs in 2 consecutive cycles, after recovery as per retreatment criteria (ANC≥1,000/mm3 and no fever), treatment may restart at the next lower dose level at investigator’s discretion. dIf no further dose reduction is possible (i.e., patient is already receiving 75 mg per day according to schedule 3/1), consider changing the schedule to 75 mg per day, 2 weeks on/2 weeks off, or discontinue palbociclib/placebo and continue with fulvestrant alone. Abbreviation: ANC, absolute neutrophil count.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk difference for AEs (hematologic laboratory and nonhematologic: all cycles, as treated). a“Infections” includes any reported preferred terms that are part of the system organ class of infections and infestations. b“Rash” includes the following preferred terms: “rash,” “rash maculo-papular,” “rash pruritic,” “rash erythematous,” “rash papular,” “dermatitis,” and “dermatitis acneiform.” Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative incidences of fatigue (all grades) and grade 3‒4 neutropenia. (A): Fatigue in patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant. (B): Grade 3‒4 neutropenia in patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant. (C): Patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant who had grade ≤2 neutropenia within the first 4 cycles and grade 3–4 neutropenia after cycle 4. “Neutropenia” includes the following preferred terms: “neutropenia,” “neutrophil count decreased.” The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate the cumulative incidence in the plot.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival in patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant. (A): Patients treated for more than 3 cycles who had maximum grade ≥3 (n = 186) vs. maximum grade ≤2 neutropenia (n = 93), per investigator assessment. (B): Patients who had at least 1 dose reduction because of neutropenia (n = 100) versus no dose reduction (n = 245). (C): Patients who had no dose reduction but had a dose interruption or cycle delay due to neutropenia (n = 199) versus the remaining patients (n = 146). “Neutropenia” was any event having a preferred term equal to “neutropenia” or “neutrophil decreased.” Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; max, maximum; NE, not estimable; PFS, progression-free survival.

Comment in

References

    1. Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L, et al. ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2) Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1871–1888. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayes EL, Lewis-Wambi JS. Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: An overview of the proposed roles of noncoding RNA. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): A randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35. - PubMed
    1. Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): Final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:425–439. - PubMed
    1. Turner NC, Ro J, André F, et al. Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:209–219. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data