Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Abstract

The associations of body mass index (BMI) and other anthropometric measurements with lung cancer were examined in 348,108 participants in the European Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) between 1992 and 2010. The study population included 2,400 case patients with incident lung cancer, and the average length of follow-up was 11 years. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models in which we modeled smoking variables with cubic splines. Overall, there was a significant inverse association between BMI (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) and the risk of lung cancer after adjustment for smoking and other confounders (for BMI of 30.0-34.9 versus 18.5-25.0, hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.84). The strength of the association declined with increasing follow-up time. Conversely, after adjustment for BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were significantly positively associated with lung cancer risk (for the highest category of waist circumference vs. the lowest, hazard ratio = 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.50). Given the decline of the inverse association between BMI and lung cancer over time, the association is likely at least partly due to weight loss resulting from preclinical lung cancer that was present at baseline. Residual confounding by smoking could also have influenced our findings.

Keywords: body mass index; lung cancer; obesity; smoking; waist circumference; waist to hip ratio; waist-to-height ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Fitted restricted cubic spline (with knots at 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 years) for hazard ratios per 1-unit change in body mass index (measured as weight (kg)/height (m)2; excluding underweight subjects) with time on follow-up, European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition, 1992–2010. Results in this plot are adjusted for study center, age at recruitment, sex, smoking status (all as strata) and duration of smoking, the lifetime number of cigarettes smoked, and the number of cigarettes smoked at baseline (all modeled with cubic spline functions). Squares indicate hazard ratios for separate 1-year periods (last period: >13 year follow-up); dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M et al. . Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;3719612:569–578. - PubMed
    1. Li X, Bai Y, Wang S et al. . Association of body mass index with chromosome damage levels and lung cancer risk among males. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9458. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Dong J, Sun K et al. . Obesity and incidence of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2013;1325:1162–1169. - PubMed
    1. Koh WP, Yuan JM, Wang R et al. . Body mass index and smoking-related lung cancer risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Br J Cancer. 2010;1023:610–614. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Forbes H et al. . Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults. Lancet. 2014;3849945:755–765. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms