Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Apr;39(2):145-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2015.11.002. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room

Reza Akhondzadeh et al. Biomed J. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The efficient and secure techniques of anesthesia and sedation have always been needed for. One of these procedures is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), due to its painfulness and long duration, has high sensitivity. We compare the effects of propofol-fentanyl (PF) with propofol-ketamine (PK) to sedate patients undergoing ERCP.

Methods: In this clinical trial, patients were divided into two groups of 49 people. A group received a pharmaceutical combination of PK, and another group received a pharmaceutical combination of PF. Vital signs of patients, Ramsey Sedation Score, and pain of patients were assessed. The total dosage of used propofol was also recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference seen in the patients' hemodynamic characteristics in both groups. Pain at the end of surgery and an hour after it in the PK group was less that was not statistically significant. By Ramsey Sedation Score also significant differences were not seen between groups (p = 0.68). By using total dose of propofol used also a significant difference was not observed between the two groups (p = 0.36). Rate of apnea in PK group was 32% and in the PF group was 63%, which this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: A comparison between the two drugs combination shows that although in terms of hemodynamic and sedation criteria both groups were similar, but because of the lower amount of pain and apnea in the PK group, this combination may generally in the ERCP procedure is more efficient and safer.

Keywords: Deep sedation; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Fentanyl; Ketamine; Propofol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akin A., Esmaoglu A., Tosun Z., Gulcu N., Aydogan H., Boyaci A. Comparison of propofol with propofol–ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing auditory brainstem response testing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:1541–1545. - PubMed
    1. Krauss B., Green S.M. Sedation and analgesia for procedures in children. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:938–945. - PubMed
    1. Joo J.D., In J.H., Kim D.W., Jung H.S., Kang J.H., Yeom J.H. The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;63:431–435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akcaboy Z.N., Akcaboy E.Y., Albayrak D., Altinoren B., Dikmen B., Gogus N. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:736–741. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenbelt B.J., Mertens M., Vuyk J. Strategies to optimise propofol-opioid anaesthesia. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:577–593. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources