Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;55(Suppl 2):55-69.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-016-1229-6. Epub 2016 Jul 2.

Sugar addiction: the state of the science

Affiliations
Review

Sugar addiction: the state of the science

Margaret L Westwater et al. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: As obesity rates continue to climb, the notion that overconsumption reflects an underlying 'food addiction' (FA) has become increasingly influential. An increasingly popular theory is that sugar acts as an addictive agent, eliciting neurobiological changes similar to those seen in drug addiction. In this paper, we review the evidence in support of sugar addiction.

Methods: We reviewed the literature on food and sugar addiction and considered the evidence suggesting the addictiveness of highly processed foods, particularly those with high sugar content. We then examined the addictive potential of sugar by contrasting evidence from the animal and human neuroscience literature on drug and sugar addiction.

Results: We find little evidence to support sugar addiction in humans, and findings from the animal literature suggest that addiction-like behaviours, such as bingeing, occur only in the context of intermittent access to sugar. These behaviours likely arise from intermittent access to sweet tasting or highly palatable foods, not the neurochemical effects of sugar.

Conclusion: Given the lack of evidence supporting it, we argue against a premature incorporation of sugar addiction into the scientific literature and public policy recommendations.

Keywords: Animal neuroscience; Binge eating; Drug addiction; Obesity; Sugar addiction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MLW, PCF and HZ have no conflicts of interest to declare. No financial sponsorship was provided to the authors or the research included in this article. Ethical standard This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

    1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trogdon J, Finkelstein E, Hylands T, et al. Indirect costs of obesity: a review of the current literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9:489–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00472.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1481–1489. doi: 10.1038/nn1579. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koob GF. The neurobiology of addiction: a neuroadaptational view relevant for diagnosis. Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl):23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01586.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulte E, Avena N, Gearhardt A. Which foods may be addictive? The roles of processing, fat content, and glycemic load. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117959. - DOI - PMC - PubMed