Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 20;138(28):8674-7.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03995. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Oligo(lactic acid)n-Paclitaxel Prodrugs for Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactic acid) Micelles: Loading, Release, and Backbiting Conversion for Anticancer Activity

Affiliations

Oligo(lactic acid)n-Paclitaxel Prodrugs for Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactic acid) Micelles: Loading, Release, and Backbiting Conversion for Anticancer Activity

Yu Tong Tam et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(d,l-lactic acid) (PEG-b-PLA) micelles are nanocarriers for poorly water-soluble anticancer agents and have advanced paclitaxel (PTX) to humans due to drug solubilization, biocompatibility, and dose escalation. However, PEG-b-PLA micelles rapidly release PTX, resulting in widespread biodistribution and low tumor exposure. To improve delivery of PTX by PEG-b-PLA micelles, monodisperse oligo(l-lactic acid), o(LA)8 or o(LA)16, has been coupled onto PTX at the 7-OH position, forming ester prodrugs: o(LA)8-PTX and o(LA)16-PTX, respectively. As expected, o(LA)n-PTX was more compatible with PEG-b-PLA micelles than PTX, increasing drug loading from 11 to 54%. While in vitro release of PTX was rapid, resulting in precipitation, o(LA)n-PTX release was more gradual: t1/2 = 14 and 26 h for o(LA)8-PTX and o(LA)16-PTX, respectively. Notably, o(LA)8-PTX and o(LA)16-PTX in PEG-b-PLA micelles resisted backbiting chain end scission, based on reverse-phase HPLC analysis. By contrast, o(LA)8-PTX and o(LA)16-PTX degraded substantially in 1:1 acetonitrile:10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, at 37 °C, generating primarily o(LA)2-PTX. The IC50 value of o(LA)2-PTX was ∼2.3 nM for A549 human lung cancer cells, equipotent with PTX in vitro. After weekly IV injections at 20 mg/kg as PEG-b-PLA micelles, o(LA)8-PTX induced tumor regression in A549 tumor-bearing mice, whereas PTX delayed tumor growth. Surprisingly, o(LA)8-PTX caused less toxicity than PTX in terms of change in body weight. In conclusion, o(LA)n acts as a novel promoiety, undergoing backbiting conversion without a reliance on metabolizing enzymes, and o(LA)n-PTX improves PTX delivery by PEG-b-PLA micelles, providing a strong justification for clinical evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Oligo(lactic acid)n-paclitaxel prodrugs for PEG-b-PLA micelles: Loading, release and backbiting conversion for anticancer activity.
Figure 2
Figure 2. In vitro
release of PTX, o(LA)8-PTX or o(LA)16-PTX prodrug from PEG-b-PLA micelles (mean ± SD, n=3).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Reverse-phase HPLC chromatograms of o(LA)8-PTX prodrug and its backbiting conversion products after incubation in 1:1 CH3CN/10 mM PBS at 37 °C, pH 7.4 at 0, 4, 12, 96 and 168 hours
Figure 4
Figure 4. Backbiting conversion of o(LA)8-PTX prodrug into o(LA)6-PTX, o(LA)4-PTX, o(LA)2-PTX and PTX (mean ± SD, n=3)
Figure 5
Figure 5. In vitro cytotoxicity of PTX, o(LA)2-PTX, o(LA)8-PTX or o(LA)16-PTX prodrug against human A549 non-small lung cancer cells. Columns: Mean of quadruplicate determinations; bars, SD; **. p<0.01 for o(LA)8-PTX compared to PTX for free and micelle forms
Figure 6
Figure 6. (A) In vivo antitumor efficacy PTX or o(LA)8-PTX prodrug (20 mg/kg) as PEG-b-PLA micelles (9% loading) in an A549 xenograft tumor model. Mice received 3 weekly injections followed by one week off for 3 cycles (mean ± SEM, n = 3–4). Bars, SEM; ***, p<0.001. (B) Relative body weight of mice treated with PTX or o(LA)8-PTX prodrug (20 mg/kg) as PEG-b-PLA micelles (9% loading). Bars: SEM; **, p<0.01
SCHEME 1
SCHEME 1
Synthetic scheme for o(LA)8-PTX and o(LA)16-PTX prodrugs.

References

    1. Xiao RZ, Zeng ZW, Zhou GL, Wang JJ, Li FZ, Wang AM. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010;5:1057. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Kim SC, Kim DW, Shim YH, Bang JS, Oh HS, Kim SW, Seo MH. J Control Release. 2001;72:191–202. - PubMed
    3. Kim TY, Kim DW, Chung JY, Shin SG, Kim SC, Heo DS, Kim NK, Bang YJ. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3708–3716. - PubMed
    4. Lee KS, Chung HC, Im SA, Park YH, Kim CS, Kim SB, Rha SY, Lee MY, Ro J. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108:241–250. - PubMed
    1. Cho H, Gao J, Kwon GS. J Control Release. 2015 in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ma X, Huang X, Huang G, Li L, Wang Y, Luo X, Boothman DA, Gao J. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3:1210–1216. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Miller T, Breyer S, van Colen G, Mier W, Haberkorn U, Geissler S, Voss S, Weigandt M, Goepferich A. Int J Pharm. 2013;445:117–124. - PubMed
    3. Owen SC, Chan DP, Shoichet MS. Nano Today. 2012;7:53–65.
    1. Forrest ML, Yáñez JA, Remsberg CM, Ohgami Y, Kwon GS, Davies NM. Pharm Res. 2008;25:194–206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ansell SM, Johnstone SA, Tardi PG, Lo L, Xie S, Shu Y, Harasym TO, Harasym NL, Williams L, Bermudes D, Liboiron BD, Saad W, Prud’homme RK, Mayer LD. J Med Chem. 2008;51:3288–3296. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms