Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):682-7.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.323.9834.

Intravenous ketamine, propofol and propofol-ketamine combination used for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized clinical study

Affiliations

Intravenous ketamine, propofol and propofol-ketamine combination used for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized clinical study

Dilek Gunay Canpolat et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background and objective: Dental treatments cannot bealways performed under local anesthesia inpediatric non-cooperative patients. For this purpose, differentanesthetic techniques have been applied to increase patient comport to dental treatments.

Methods: Sixty children classified as ASA I-II, between aged 3 to 9, who were scheduled to undergo tooth extraction, were enrolled for this randomized study. Group K received 1 mg/kg ketamine, Group P received 1 mg/kg propofol, and Group KP received 0.5 mg/kg propofol plus 0.5 mg/kg ketamine intravenously for anesthesia induction.

Results: Recovery time was significantly lower in Group P than Group KP. No significant differences were found between groups regarding HR, before and after the induction, at tenth minute. Fifth minute's HR was higher in Group K than Group KP. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) values were similar at baseline, before and after the induction, and at tenth minute, whereas significantly lower values were found in Group P and Group KP than in Group K at fifth minute.

Conclusions: Although ketamine, propofol and ketamine-propofol combination are effective for sedation in tooth extraction in pediatric patients, propofol may be an excellent alternative, with the shortest recovery, no nausea and vomiting, and reasonable surgical satisfaction.

Keywords: Ketamine; Propofol; Sedation; Tooth extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Heart Rate of the groups (beat/min) aHigher in Group K than Group KP, bSignificant increase compared with baseline.
Fig.2
Fig.2
Mean arterial pressure of the groups (mmHg). aSignificant decrease compared with Group K, cSignificant decrease compared with Group KP, bSignificant increase compared with basaline

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giovannitti JA., Jr Dental anesthesia and pediatric dentistry. Anesth Prog. 1995;42:95–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantekin K, Yildirim MD, Cantekin I. Assessing change in quality of life and dental anxiety in young children following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36(1):12E–17E. - PubMed
    1. Cantekin K, Yildirim MD, Delikan E, Cetin S. Postoperative discomfort of dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):784–788. doi:10.12669/pjms.304.4807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roelofse JA, Shipton EA, de la Harpe CJ, Blignaut RJ. Intranasal sufentanil/midazolam versus ketamine/midazolam for analgesia/sedation in the pediatric population prior to undergoing multiple dental extractions under general anesthesia:a prospective, double-blind, randomized comparison. Anesth Prog. 2004;51:1114–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alletag MJ, Auerbach MA, Baum CR. Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28:1391–1395. doi:10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276fde2. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources