Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun 20:7:70.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00070. eCollection 2016.

The Role of ACTH and Corticosteroids for Sepsis and Septic Shock: An Update

Affiliations
Review

The Role of ACTH and Corticosteroids for Sepsis and Septic Shock: An Update

Djillali Annane. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Sepsis is a common disorder associated with high morbidity and mortality. It is now defined as an abnormal host response to infection, resulting in life-threatening dysfunction of organs. There is evidence from in vitro and in vivo experiments in various animal models and in patients that endotoxin or sepsis may directly and indirectly alter the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal response to severe infection. These alterations may include necrosis or hemorrhage or inflammatory mediator-mediated decreased ACTH synthesis, steroidogenesis, cortisol delivery to tissues, clearance from plasma, and decreased sensitivity of tissues to cortisol. Disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis may translate in patients with sepsis into cardiovascular and other organ dysfunction, and eventually an increase in the risk of death. Exogenous administration of corticosteroids at moderate dose, i.e., <400 mg of hydrocortisone or equivalent for >96 h, may help reversing sepsis-associated shock and organ dysfunction. Corticosteroids may also shorten the duration of stay in the ICU. Except for increased blood glucose and sodium levels, treatment with corticosteroids was rather well tolerated in the context of clinical trials. The benefit of treatment on survival remains controversial. Based on available randomized controlled trials, the likelihood of survival benefit is greater in septic shock versus sepsis patients, in sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome or with community-acquired pneumonia versus patients without these conditions, and in patients with a blunted cortisol response to 250 μg of ACTH test versus those with normal response.

Keywords: cytokines; hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis; nitric oxide; sepsis; stress response.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Moss M. Epidemiology of sepsis: race, sex, and chronic alcohol abuse. Clin Infect Dis (2005) 41(Suppl 7):S490–7.10.1086/432003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA (2010) 304:1787–94.10.1001/jama.2010.1553 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annane D, Sharshar T. Cognitive decline after sepsis. Lancet Respir Med (2015) 3:61–9.10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70246-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3). JAMA (2016) 315:1–10.10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature (1936) 138:32.10.1038/138032a0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources