Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 22:2016:6296458.
doi: 10.1155/2016/6296458. eCollection 2016.

Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Traditional Cosmetics Sold in Tunisian Local Markets

Affiliations

Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Traditional Cosmetics Sold in Tunisian Local Markets

Mohamed Anouar Nouioui et al. Int Sch Res Notices. .

Abstract

This study was undertaken in order to determine heavy metal contents in twelve (n = 12) henna brands and eleven (n = 11) kohl products. An analytical test was performed for Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn in henna and kohl products using atomic absorption spectrophotometery. The overall mean concentrations of heavy metals in henna varied between 1.2 and 8.9 μg g(-1) for Pb; 0.8 and 18.6 μg g(-1) for Cd; 0.5 μg g(-1) and 3.3 μg g(-1) for Cu; and 3.7 μg g(-1) and 90.0 μg g(-1) for Zn. As for kohl products, Pb concentrations ranged between 51.1 μg g(-1) and 4839.5 μg g(-1), Cd concentrations ranged between 1.0 μg g(-1) and 158.6 μg g(-1), Cu concentrations ranged between 2.5 μg g(-1) and 162.5 μg g(-1), and Zn concentrations ranged between 0.7 μg g(-1) and 185.0 μg g(-1). The results of our study revealed that Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn contents in investigated samples were high, making from the prolonged use of such products a potential threat to human health. Therefore, major quality controls are recommended in order to enforce acceptable limits of potential contaminants in cosmetics and good manufacturing practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EDXRF spectra of both (a) the natural stone kohl sample and (b) the local kohl sample (S-5).
Figure 2
Figure 2
EDXRF spectra of both the (a) green henna sample (H-1) and of the (b) red-brown henna (H-2) sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Loretz L. J., Api A. M., Babcock L., et al. Exposure data for cosmetic products: facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2008;46(5):1516–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.12.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nohynek G. J., Antignac E., Re T., Toutain H. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2010;243(2):239–259. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomankova K., Kejlova K., Binder S., et al. In vitro cytotoxicity and phototoxicity study of cosmetics colorants. Toxicology in Vitro. 2011;25(6):1242–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.04.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpe M. G., Nazzaro M., Coppola R., Rapuano F., Aquino R. P. Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmetics from China, Italy, and USA. Microchemical Journal. 2012;101:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2011.10.008. - DOI
    1. Sainio E.-L., Jolanki R., Hakala E., Kanerva L. Metals and arsenic in eye shadows. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42(1):5–10. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042001005.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources