Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158612.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158612. eCollection 2016.

The Effect of Perioperative E-Health Interventions on the Postoperative Course: A Systematic Review of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials

Eva van der Meij  1   2 , Johannes R Anema  2 , René H J Otten  3 , Judith A F Huirne  1 , Frederieke G Schaafsma  2
Affiliations

The Effect of Perioperative E-Health Interventions on the Postoperative Course: A Systematic Review of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials

Eva van der Meij et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: E-health interventions have become increasingly popular, including in perioperative care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of perioperative e-health interventions on the postoperative course.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and searched for relevant articles in the PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and COCHRANE databases. Controlled trials written in English, with participants of 18 years and older who underwent any type of surgery and which evaluated any type of e-health intervention by reporting patient-related outcome measures focusing on the period after surgery, were included. Data of all included studies were extracted and study quality was assessed by using the Downs and Black scoring system.

Findings: A total of 33 articles were included, reporting on 27 unique studies. Most studies were judged as having a medium risk of bias (n = 13), 11 as a low risk of bias, and three as high risk of bias studies. Most studies included patients undergoing cardiac (n = 9) or orthopedic surgery (n = 7). All studies focused on replacing (n = 11) or complementing (n = 15) perioperative usual care with some form of care via ICT; one study evaluated both type of interventions. Interventions consisted of an educational or supportive website, telemonitoring, telerehabilitation or teleconsultation. All studies measured patient-related outcomes focusing on the physical, the mental or the general component of recovery. 11 studies (40.7%) reported outcome measures related to the effectiveness of the intervention in terms of health care usage and costs. 25 studies (92.6%) reported at least an equal (n = 8) or positive (n = 17) effect of the e-health intervention compared to usual care. In two studies (7.4%) a positive effect on any outcome was found in favour of the control group.

Conclusion: Based on this systematic review we conclude that in the majority of the studies e-health leads to similar or improved clinical patient-related outcomes compared to only face to face perioperative care for patients who have undergone various forms of surgery. However, due to the low or moderate quality of many studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Prisma Flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Duplaga M (2013) The acceptance of e-health solutions among patients with chronic respiratory conditions. Telemed J E Health 19:683–691 10.1089/tmj.2012.0306 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fairbrother P, Ure J, Hanley J, McCloughan L, Denvir M, Sheikh A et al. (2014) Telemonitoring for chronic heart failure: the views of patients and healthcare professionals—a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 23:132–144 10.1111/jocn.12137 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tang C, Lorenzi N, Harle CA, Zhou X, Chen Y (2016) Interactive systems for patient-centered care to enhance patient engagement. J Am Med Inform Assoc 23:2–4 10.1093/jamia/ocv198 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barello S, Triberti S, Graffigna G, Libreri C, Serino S, Hibbard J et al. (2015) eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 6:2013 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook DJ, Manning DM, Holland DE, Prinsen SK, Rudzik SD, Roger VL et al. (2013) Patient engagement and reported outcomes in surgical recovery: effectiveness of an e-health platform. J Am Coll Surg 217:648–655 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources