Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 27385377
- DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12489
Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Pre-induction cervical ripening greatly influences the outcome of induction of labour (IOL).
Aims: To compare the efficacy of combined Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol with Foley's catheter or low-dose vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.
Materials and methods: Women with a singleton pregnancy admitted at term for cervical ripening and IOL based on clinical indication were randomised into three groups. Oxytocin augmentation was done in the groups as indicated. Significant tests were done using chi square, Fisher's exact and analysis of variance tests.
Results: A total of 210 women were randomised into the study. Women in the combined group (Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol) had significantly higher postcervical ripening Bishop's score than the women in the other two groups; P = 0.001. Cervical ripening time, induction-delivery time and cervical ripening-delivery interval were significantly shorter in the combined group compared to the other two groups; P = 0.001. Also, women in the combined group required significantly lesser oxytocin augmentation than the other two groups; P = 0.001. There was no difference in Apgar scores at 1 or 5 minutes or in special baby care unit admission among the groups. There were no reported cases of uterine contractile abnormalities or rupture in this study.
Conclusion: Combined Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol provide a shorter duration to the achievement of cervical ripening.
Keywords: Foley's catheter; Nigeria; cervical ripening; induction of labour; misoprostol.
© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Feb;57(1):119. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12562. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017. PMID: 28251637 No abstract available.
-
Combined Foley's catheter and misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Feb;57(1):118. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12561. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017. PMID: 28251641 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Feb;42(2):232-238. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1904227. Epub 2021 May 24. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34027782 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jul 12;18(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1793-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30001195 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Aug;25(6):565-8. doi: 10.1080/01443610500231450. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005. PMID: 16234141 Clinical Trial.
-
Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):468-76. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12935. Epub 2014 Jul 3. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 24989790 Review.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 May;1(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019. PMID: 33345815
Cited by
-
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3:CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. PMID: 31623014 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Retrospective Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Induction of Childbirth in 4350 Women from a Single Center in Warsaw, Poland.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159540. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35954893 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36996264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cervical ripening with vaginal Misoprostol plus Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide versus vaginal Misoprostol alone among pregnant women: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.Ghana Med J. 2024 Mar;58(1):44-52. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v58i1.7. Ghana Med J. 2024. PMID: 38957282 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Challenges and Limitations of Clinical Trials on Labor Induction: A Review of the Literature.AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e365-e378. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676577. Epub 2018 Dec 26. AJP Rep. 2018. PMID: 30591843 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources