Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2016 Jul 7;35(1):66.
doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0117-z.

Long-term survival of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study

Affiliations
Comment

Long-term survival of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study

Hao-Xian Yang. Chin J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: In the past decade, many researchers focused on to robot-assisted surgery. However, on long-term outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether the robotic procedure is superior to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy is unclear. Nonetheless, in the article titled "Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of robotic, video assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy" by Yang et al. that was recently published in Annals of Surgery, the authors provided convincing evidence that the robotic procedure results in similar long-term survival as compared with VATS and thoracotomy. Minimally invasive procedures typically result in shorter lengths of hospital stay, and the robotic procedure in particular results in superior lymph node assessment.

Main body: Our propensity score-matched study generated high-quality data. Based on our findings, we see promise in expanding patient access to robotic lung resections. In this study, propensity score matching minimized the bias involved between groups. Nevertheless, due to its retrospective nature, bias may still exist. Currently, the concept of rapid rehabilitation is widely accepted, and it is very difficult to set up a randomized controlled trial to compare robotic, VATS, and thoracotomy procedures for the treatment of NSCLC. Therefore, to overcome this limitation and to minimize bias, the best approach is to use a registry and prospectively collected, propensity score-matched data.

Conclusions: Robotic lung resections result in similar long-term survival as compared with VATS and thoracotomy. Robot-assisted and VATS procedures are associated with short lengths of hospital stay, and the robotic procedure in particular results in superior lymph node assessment. Considering the alarming increase in the incidence of lung cancer in China, a nationwide database of prospectively collected data available for clinical research would be especially important.

Keywords: Long-term survival; Non–small cell lung cancer; Registry data; Robot-assisted surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. The updated incidences and mortalities of major cancers in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:502–507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urman A, Hosgood HD. Curbing the burden of lung cancer. Front Med. 2016;10:228–232. doi: 10.1007/s11684-016-0447-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:380–384. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pardolesi A, Park B, Petrella S, Borri A, Gasparri R, Veronesi G. Robotic anatomic segmentectomy of the lung: technical aspects and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:929–934. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.086. - DOI - PubMed