Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;87(8):829-37.
doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0159-0.

[Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy]

[Article in German]
A Schulze-Bonhage et al. Nervenarzt. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.

Keywords: Drug refractory epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Invasive diagnostics; Neurostimulation; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Epilepsia. 2010 Jun;51(6):1010-7 - PubMed
    1. Epilepsy Res. 2015 Jul;113:98-103 - PubMed
    1. Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):356-363 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurgery. 1998 Dec;43(6):1265-76; discussion 1276-80 - PubMed
    1. Ann Neurol. 2010 Feb;67(2):209-20 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources