Microbial protein: future sustainable food supply route with low environmental footprint
- PMID: 27389856
- PMCID: PMC4993174
- DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12369
Microbial protein: future sustainable food supply route with low environmental footprint
Abstract
Microbial biotechnology has a long history of producing feeds and foods. The key feature of today's market economy is that protein production by conventional agriculture based food supply chains is becoming a major issue in terms of global environmental pollution such as diffuse nutrient and greenhouse gas emissions, land use and water footprint. Time has come to re-assess the current potentials of producing protein-rich feed or food additives in the form of algae, yeasts, fungi and plain bacterial cellular biomass, producible with a lower environmental footprint compared with other plant or animal-based alternatives. A major driver is the need to no longer disintegrate but rather upgrade a variety of low-value organic and inorganic side streams in our current non-cyclic economy. In this context, microbial bioconversions of such valuable matters to nutritive microbial cells and cell components are a powerful asset. The worldwide market of animal protein is of the order of several hundred million tons per year, that of plant protein several billion tons of protein per year; hence, the expansion of the production of microbial protein does not pose disruptive challenges towards the process of the latter. Besides protein as nutritive compounds, also other cellular components such as lipids (single cell oil), polyhydroxybuthyrate, exopolymeric saccharides, carotenoids, ectorines, (pro)vitamins and essential amino acids can be of value for the growing domain of novel nutrition. In order for microbial protein as feed or food to become a major and sustainable alternative, addressing the challenges of creating awareness and achieving public and broader regulatory acceptance are real and need to be addressed with care and expedience.
© 2016 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.
Figures
), yeast (Candida spp.) (
), algae (Spirulina maxima (
), compared with the high‐quality animal protein from fishmeal (
) as well as to the
) for amino acid scoring pattern for human nutrition. Source: Harper (1981); Tacon (1987)
) and freshwater (
) requirements of References
-
- Anupama, and Ravindra, P. (2000) Value‐added food: single cell protein. Biotechnol Adv 18: 459–479. - PubMed
-
- Becker, E.W. (2007) Micro‐algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol Adv 25: 207–210. - PubMed
-
- Beer, E. (2015) “No success model” for new protein ingredients [WWW Document]. URL http://www.foodnavigator.com/Market-Trends/No-success-model-for-new-prot...
-
- Berglund, E. (2003) Human impact and climate changes—synchronous events and a causal link? Quat. Int. 105: 7–12.
-
- Byrne, J. (2016) Calysta says gas to fishmeal replacement protein on path to commercialization [WWW Document]. URL http://www.feednavigator.com/R-D/Calysta-says-gas-to-fishmeal-replacemen...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
