Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):103-116.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2053-6.

Guidelines and Interventions Related to the Postpartum Visit for Low-Risk Postpartum Women in High and Upper Middle Income Countries

Affiliations
Review

Guidelines and Interventions Related to the Postpartum Visit for Low-Risk Postpartum Women in High and Upper Middle Income Countries

Katrina Stumbras et al. Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives A two-part review was undertaken to: (1) summarize current guidelines on the timing and frequency of postpartum follow-up care for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women and to delineate the evidence on which these guidelines are based; and, (2) summarize the results of intervention studies focused on increasing utilization of the postpartum visit for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women. Methods A review of guidelines from high and upper middle income countries published between 2000 and 2016 in English related to non-high risk postpartum follow-up visits was conducted in 2014-2016 using four databases and additional sources. In addition, articles published between 1990 and 2016 which evaluated interventions from high to upper middle income countries related to increasing attendance at the postpartum visit were gathered using three databases. Results This review located eight guidelines, all of which relied on expert opinion/group consensus as the evidence for their recommendations regarding the timing of the postpartum visit. The review located 19 intervention studies focused on increasing use of the postpartum visit; in 12 there was statistically significant evidence that these approaches improved utilization. However, no intervention strategy was evaluated more than a few times and many of the evaluations were relatively dated. Conclusions Guidelines for the timing of the postpartum visit are variable and are typically based on weak evidence; however, there is support for increased flexibility to meet women's needs. Additionally, while there is a diverse set of promising interventions to increase utilization of the postpartum visit, there is limited evaluative information. Future initiatives should focus on more rigorous evaluation.

Keywords: Antenatal and postnatal interventions; Guidelines; Postpartum follow-up care; Postpartum visit.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Matern Child Health J. 2006 Nov;10(6):511-6 - PubMed
    1. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;45(1):55-7 - PubMed
    1. J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 1):513-9 - PubMed
    1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Dec 21;56(50):1312-6 - PubMed
    1. Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):90-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources