La mention « non substituable » de la prescription à la délivrance : comparaison des points de vue des médecins généralistes libéraux et des pharmaciens d'officine de la région Midi-Pyrénées
- PMID: 27392883
- DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2014053
La mention « non substituable » de la prescription à la délivrance : comparaison des points de vue des médecins généralistes libéraux et des pharmaciens d'officine de la région Midi-Pyrénées
Abstract
Background: The "nonrefundable" term use leads to the princep's drug dispensing. The aim of our study was to compare the views of its use between general practitioners and community pharmacists.
Methods: We conducted a descriptive study with similar questionnaires about "nonfundable" term use. A chi-2 test was used in order to detect a difference between the answers of general practitioners ant pharmacists.
Results: The general practitioners and pharmacists views of "nonrefundable" used was different (p<0.05). General practitioners majority used this term because of their patients demand.
Discussion: General practitioners are using the term "nonrefundable" because of their patients demand and they don't integrate this use in their therapeutics decision.
Keywords: décision thérapeutique; generic’s drugs; médicaments génériques; primary cares; soins primaires; substitution; therapeutic decision.
Copyright © 2014 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources