Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;38(12):1765-1771.
doi: 10.1002/hed.24529. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Influence of timing, radiation, and reconstruction on complications and speech outcomes with tracheoesophageal puncture

Affiliations

Influence of timing, radiation, and reconstruction on complications and speech outcomes with tracheoesophageal puncture

Sarah A Gitomer et al. Head Neck. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the impact of radiation, reconstruction, and timing of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) on complications and speech outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective review identified 145 patients who underwent TEP between 2003 and 2007.

Results: Ninety-nine patients (68%) had primary and 46 (32%) had secondary TEP, with complications occurring in 65% and 61%, respectively (p = .96). Twenty-nine patients (20%) had major complications (18 primary and 11 secondary; p = .42). Ninety-four patients (65%) had pre-TEP radiation, 39 (27%) post-TEP radiation, and 12 (8%) no radiation. With patients grouped by TEP timing and radiation history, there was no difference in complications, fluency, or TEP use. With mean 4.7-year follow-up, 82% primary and 85% secondary used TEP for primary communication (p = .66). Free-flap patients used TEP more commonly for primary communication after secondary versus primary TEP (90% vs 50%; p = .02).

Conclusion: Primary and secondary tracheoesophageal speakers experience similar high rates of complications. Extent of pharyngeal reconstruction, rather than radiation, may be more important in selection of TEP timing. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1765-1771, 2016.

Keywords: complications; speech outcomes; tracheoesophageal prosthesis; tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure I
Figure I
Relative complication rates based on timing of TEP and radiation (XRT) *No significant difference between complications in any group, all p > 0.05. **Major complications included spontaneous or intentional TEP closures, complications requiring surgical intervention, and pneumonia secondary to leakage ***Direct complications included enlarged TEP, aspiration of prosthesis, pneumonia secondary to leakage, spontaneous or intentional closure of TEP, partial TE tract closure, granulation tissue and superior tract migration.
Figure II
Figure II
Outcomes and complications in patients with free-flap reconstruction

References

    1. Robertson SM, Yeo JC, Dunnet C, Young D, Mackenzie K. Voice, swallowing, and quality of life after total laryngectomy: results of the west of Scotland laryngectomy audit. Head Neck. 2012;34:59–65. - PubMed
    1. Stafford FW. Current indications and complications of tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration after laryngectomy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:89–95. - PubMed
    1. Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:529–33. - PubMed
    1. Cheng E, Ho M, Ganz C, et al. Outcomes of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: a 16-year retrospective analysis. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006;85:264–7. - PubMed
    1. Op de Coul BM, Hilgers F, Balm AJ, et al. A decade of post laryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1320–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms