Inadequate Sedation During Therapeutic Paralysis: Use of Bispectral Index in Critically Ill Patients
- PMID: 27398299
- PMCID: PMC4914538
- DOI: 10.1007/s40801-016-0076-3
Inadequate Sedation During Therapeutic Paralysis: Use of Bispectral Index in Critically Ill Patients
Abstract
Background: Patients receiving therapeutic paralysis may experience inadequate sedation due to intrinsic limitations of behavioral sedation assessment. Bispectral index (BIS™) provides an objective measure of sedation; however, the role of BIS™ is not well defined in intensive care unit (ICU) patients on neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA).
Objective: The aim of this study was to delineate the relationship between BIS™ and level of sedation for critically ill patients during therapeutic paralysis.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in ICU patients receiving continuous infusion NMBA and BIS™ monitoring. The primary endpoint was the correlation of BIS™ <60 during therapeutic paralysis with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) of -4 to -5 (i.e., deep or unarousable sedation) at the time of emergence from therapeutic paralysis.
Results: Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Three of these patients (9.6 %) were inadequately sedated upon emergence from paralysis; that is, restless or agitated (RASS +1 to +2). We did not observe a correlation between BIS™ and RASS upon emergence from paralysis (r = 0.27, p = 0.14). The sensitivity of BIS™ <60 in predicting deep sedation (RASS -5 to -4) was 100 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0-100) with a positive predictive value of 35.7 %. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of BIS™ <60 in predicting light sedation or deeper (RASS -5 to -2) was 92.9 % (95 %CI 83.3-100) and 92.9 %, respectively.
Conclusion: These results suggest that 1 in 10 critically ill patients receiving therapeutic paralysis may be inadequately sedated. BIS™ monitoring may serve as a useful adjunctive measure of sedation in critically ill patients receiving therapeutic paralysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with Ethical Standards Ethical approvals Approval of this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board and the need for informed consent was waived (IRB ID# 534116). Conflict of interest Dr Tasaka, Dr Duby, Dr Pandya, Dr Wilson and Dr Hardin do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose. Funding The project described was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), through Grant #UL1 TR000002.
Figures
References
-
- Wagner BKJ, Zavotsky KE, Sweeney JB, Palmeri BA, Hammond JS. Patient recall of therapeutic paralysis in a surgical critical care unit. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18(2):358–363. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
