Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):525-32.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9797.

United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps

Affiliations
Review

United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps

Barack Obama. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: The Affordable Care Act is the most important health care legislation enacted in the United States since the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. The law implemented comprehensive reforms designed to improve the accessibility, affordability, and quality of health care.

Objectives: To review the factors influencing the decision to pursue health reform, summarize evidence on the effects of the law to date, recommend actions that could improve the health care system, and identify general lessons for public policy from the Affordable Care Act.

Evidence: Analysis of publicly available data, data obtained from government agencies, and published research findings. The period examined extends from 1963 to early 2016.

Findings: The Affordable Care Act has made significant progress toward solving long-standing challenges facing the US health care system related to access, affordability, and quality of care. Since the Affordable Care Act became law, the uninsured rate has declined by 43%, from 16.0% in 2010 to 9.1% in 2015, primarily because of the law's reforms. Research has documented accompanying improvements in access to care (for example, an estimated reduction in the share of nonelderly adults unable to afford care of 5.5 percentage points), financial security (for example, an estimated reduction in debts sent to collection of $600-$1000 per person gaining Medicaid coverage), and health (for example, an estimated reduction in the share of nonelderly adults reporting fair or poor health of 3.4 percentage points). The law has also begun the process of transforming health care payment systems, with an estimated 30% of traditional Medicare payments now flowing through alternative payment models like bundled payments or accountable care organizations. These and related reforms have contributed to a sustained period of slow growth in per-enrollee health care spending and improvements in health care quality. Despite this progress, major opportunities to improve the health care system remain.

Conclusions and relevance: Policy makers should build on progress made by the Affordable Care Act by continuing to implement the Health Insurance Marketplaces and delivery system reform, increasing federal financial assistance for Marketplace enrollees, introducing a public plan option in areas lacking individual market competition, and taking actions to reduce prescription drug costs. Although partisanship and special interest opposition remain, experience with the Affordable Care Act demonstrates that positive change is achievable on some of the nation's most complex challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The author has completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The author’s public financial disclosure report for calendar year 2015 may be viewed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/documents/oge_278_cy_2015_obama_051616.pdf.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of Individuals in the United States Without Health Insurance, 1963–2015 Data are derived from the National Health Interview Survey and, for years prior to 1982, supplementary information from other survey sources and administrative records. The methods used to construct a comparable series spanning the entire period build on those in Cohen et al and Cohen and are described in detail in Council of Economic Advisers 2014. For years 1989 and later, data are annual. For prior years, data are generally but not always biannual. ACA indicates Affordable Care Act.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Decline in Adult Uninsured Rate From 2013 to 2015 vs 2013 Uninsured Rate by State Data are derived from the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index as reported by Witters and reflect uninsured rates for individuals 18 years or older. Dashed lines reflect the result of an ordinary least squares regression relating the change in the uninsured rate from 2013 to 2015 to the level of the uninsured rate in 2013, run separately for each group of states. The 29 states in which expanded coverage took effect before the end of 2015 were categorized as Medicaid expansion states, and the remaining 21 states were categorized as Medicaid nonexpansion states.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percentage of Workers With Employer-Based Single Coverage Without an Annual Limit on Out-of-pocket Spending Data from the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Education Trust Employer Health Benefits Survey.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Rate of Change in Real per-Enrollee Spending by Payer Data are derived from the National Health Expenditure Accounts. Inflation adjustments use the Gross Domestic Product Price Index reported in the National Income and Product Accounts. The mean growth rate for Medicare spending reported for 2005 through 2010 omits growth from 2005 to 2006 to exclude the effect of the creation of Medicare Part D.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Out-of-pocket Spending as a Percentage of Total Health Care Spending for Individuals Enrolled in Employer-Based Coverage Data for the series labeled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were derived from MEPS Household Component and reflect the ratio of out-of-pocket expenditures to total expenditures for nonelderly individuals reporting full-year employer coverage. Data for the series labeled Health Care Cost Institute (HCCI) were derived from the analysis of the HCCI claims database reported in Herrera et al, HCCI 2015, and HCCI 2015; to capture data revisions, the most recent value reported for each year was used. Data for the series labeled Claxton et al were derived from the analyses of the Trueven Marketscan claims database reported by Claxton et al 2016.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Medicare 30-Day, All-Condition Hospital Readmission Rate Data were provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (written communication; March 2016). The plotted series reflects a 12-month moving average of the hospital readmission rates reported for discharges occurring in each month.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Health Expenditure Data: NHE tables. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Tren.... Published December 3, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
    1. Anderson GF, Frogner BK. Health spending in OECD countries: obtaining value per dollar. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27(6):1718–1727. - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending: part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):273–287. - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending: part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):288–298. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–2645. - PubMed

MeSH terms