Efficacy of pneumodilation in achalasia after failed Heller myotomy
- PMID: 27401049
- DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12875
Efficacy of pneumodilation in achalasia after failed Heller myotomy
Abstract
Background: Heller myotomy is an effective treatment for the majority of achalasia patients. However, a small proportion of patients suffer from persistent or recurrent symptoms after surgery and they are usually subsequently treated with pneumodilation (PD). Data on the efficacy of PD as secondary treatment for achalasia are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PD as treatment for achalasia patients suffering from persistent or recurrent symptoms after Heller myotomy.
Methods: Patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms (Eckardt score >3) after Heller myotomy were selected. Patients were treated with PD, using a graded distension protocol with balloon sizes ranging from 30 to 40 mm. After each dilation symptoms were assessed to evaluate whether a subsequent dilation with a larger balloon size was required. Patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms (Eckardt score >3) after treatment with a 40-mm balloon were identified as failures.
Key results: Twenty-four patients were included in total; 15 patients with achalasia type I, seven with achalasia type II and two with achalasia type III. Median relapse time was 2.5 years after Heller myotomy (IQR: 9 years and 3 months). Three patients were not suitable for PD; one patient was morbidly obese and not fit for any form of sedation and two had a siphon-shaped esophagus leaving 21 patients to treat. Eight patients were successfully treated with a single 30-mm balloon dilation (median follow-up time: 6.5 years; IQR: 7.5 years). Four patients required dilations with 30- and 35-mm balloons (median follow-up time: 11 years; IQR: 3 years). Nine patients failed on the 35-mm balloon dilation and underwent a subsequent dilation with a 40-mm balloon, and all failed on this balloon as well. Thus, PD was successful in 12 of the 21 treatable patients, resulting in a success rate of 57% for treatable patients or 50% for all patients. Baseline Eckardt scores were also higher in those that failed (median: 8; IQR: 2) than those that were treated successfully (median: 5.5; IQR: 2) treated (p = 0.009). Furthermore, baseline barium column height at 5 min was higher in patients with failed (median: 6 cm; IQR: 6 cm) treatment than in patients with successful (median: 2.6 cm; IQR: 4.7 cm) treatment (p = 0.016). Baseline lower esophageal sphincter pressure was not different between patients who were treated successfully (median: 11 mmHg; IQR: 5 mmHg) and those that failed on PD (median: 17.5 mmHg; IQR: 10.8 mmHg) treatment (p > 0.05). Baseline symptom pattern was also not a predictor of successful treatment. No adverse events were recorded during or after PD.
Conclusions & inferences: Pneumodilation for recurrent symptoms after previous Heller myotomy is safe and has a modest success rate of 57%, using 30- and 35-mm balloons. Patients with recurrent symptoms after PD with 35-mm balloon are likely to also fail after subsequent dilation with a 40-mm balloon.
Keywords: Eckardt symptom sore; dysphagia; esophagus; lower esophageal sphincter; manometry.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Gastroenterology. 2023 Jun;164(7):1108-1118.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.048. Epub 2023 Mar 11. Gastroenterology. 2023. PMID: 36907524 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 28;22(20):4918-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27239118 Free PMC article.
-
Management of recurrent symptoms after per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia.Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 May 3. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28478028
-
Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):1949-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08353-w. Epub 2021 Mar 2. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33655443
-
Achalasia: what to do in the face of failures of Heller myotomy.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Dec;1481(1):236-246. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14440. Epub 2020 Jul 26. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020. PMID: 32713020 Review.
Cited by
-
Esophagogastric Junction Distensibility on Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Topography Predicts Treatment Response in Achalasia-Anatomy Matters!Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;114(9):1455-1463. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000137. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30741739 Free PMC article.
-
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia.Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;115(9):1393-1411. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000731. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32773454 Free PMC article.
-
Does laparoscopic reoperation yield symptomatic improvements similar to those of primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients?Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):4991-5000. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07978-7. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32968910
-
S093: pneumatic balloon dilation for palliation of recurrent symptoms of achalasia after esophagomyotomy.Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):4017-4021. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6271-4. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29905893
-
Esophageal Achalasia: Pros and Cons of the Treatment Options.World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1554-1560. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06495-z. Epub 2022 Mar 3. World J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35238987 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources