Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Jun;21(5):1457-1464.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1906-0. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Mini dental assessment: a simple screening test for non-dental staff

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Mini dental assessment: a simple screening test for non-dental staff

B Wöstmann et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a simple tool for the assessment of possible dental treatment needs (DTN) for non-dental professionals (Mini Dental Assessment, MDA). To keep the assessment universal, we aimed to base it on the patient's history and a simple chewing efficiency test (CET) as the dental status is a known determinant for chewing efficiency.

Materials & methods: The assessment was developed using data from 169 patients from two sites (University Hospital Giessen, St. Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, both Germany). In all patients, a dental examination was performed, the denture status was evaluated (based on the California Dental Association criteria; CDA criteria), and the DTN was determined. In addition, the time since the patient's last visit to a dentist (TLVD) and denture age (DA) were assessed. Furthermore, a CET was carried out and the comminution score was determined (CETS).

Results: In total, 108 patients required dental treatment. The mean value (±SD) was 2.9 ± 0.9 score points for the DTN, 2.5 ± 3.8 years for the TLVD, and 10.8 ± 8.9 years for the DA. There was a significant correlation (Spearman, P < .05) between the DTN and degree of comminution (3.4 ± 1.8). Based on the results of the statistical analysis, the intended assessment tool was developed using the variables CETS, TLVD, and DA weighed by their respective regression coefficients (10:3:1). Subsequently, the resulting MDA score (51.32 ± 28.14) was calculated. A sensitivity/specificity analysis was conducted and a receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated (SPSS 17.0, area under curve 0.805; 95 % CI 0.738-0.873).

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the dental status of elderly patients is reflected in the outcome of the MDA. However, ongoing validation is needed.

Trial registration: DRKS00003219.

Keywords: Clinical studies/trials; Decision-making; Diagnostic systems, gerontology; Geriatric dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Dent Res. 2007 Dec;86(12):1171-5 - PubMed
    1. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Sep;34(9):671-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Mar;49(3):193-8 - PubMed
    1. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):147-50 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):9985-90 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources