Using implementation science to improve urologic oncology care
- PMID: 27401405
- PMCID: PMC6823516
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.022
Using implementation science to improve urologic oncology care
Abstract
There are many gaps between recommended urologic cancer care and real-world practice. Although we increasingly define these quality gaps because of our growing health services research capacity in urologic oncology, we often fall short in translating these findings into effective interventions and strategies to reduce gaps in care. In this article, we highlight implementation research as a logical next step for translating our health services research findings into effective individual and organizational behavior change strategies to improve quality of care. We explain how implementation research focuses on different, upstream outcomes from our clinical outcomes to get the right care to the right patient at the right time. Lastly, we share information about resources and training for those interested in learning more about this emerging, transdisciplinary field.
Keywords: Dissemination; Implementation; Oncology; Translation; Voltage drop.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
References
-
- Bassett JC, et al., Impact of a bladder cancer diagnosis on smoking behavior. J Clin Oncol, 2012. 30(15): p. 1871–8. - PubMed
-
- Bjurlin MA, Goble SM, and Hollowell CM, Smoking cessation assistance for patients with bladder cancer: a national survey of American urologists. J Urol, 2010. 184(5): p. 1901–6. - PubMed
-
- Friedenreich CM, et al., Physical Activity and Survival After Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol, 2016. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
