Surgical Outcome Predictor in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease Based on Health Related Quality of Life Using Euro-Quality 5 Dimensions Analysis
- PMID: 27401654
- PMCID: PMC4960389
- DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1214
Surgical Outcome Predictor in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease Based on Health Related Quality of Life Using Euro-Quality 5 Dimensions Analysis
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to introduce the predictive value of a quantitatively described formula model in a multicenter prospective analysis using the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) health scale to anticipate postoperative improvement in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease (DLSD).
Materials and methods: Quality of life was evaluated in 376 patients from 17 tertiary hospitals before and after spinal decompression and fusion surgery. The five items of the EQ-5D, mobility (M), self-care (S), usual activities (A), pain/discomfort (P), and anxiety/depression (D), were checked as level 1, 2, or 3, with 3 being the worst. A minimal significant change in the calculated EQ-5D (cEQ-5D) was set as 0.05. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the highest successful outcome (cEQ-5D improvement after operation >0.05) with the given sets of 5 items of the EQ-5D.
Results: In the cEQ-5D analysis, among patients with a formula score of S+A+2×P+D≤8, 18/68 (27%) showed significant improvement in the cEQ-5D at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.05). However, in patients with a formula score of ≥9, 265/308 (86%) demonstrated significant improvements in the cEQ-5D at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.05).
Conclusion: We suggest that S+A+2×P+D≥9 in the EQ-5D can quantitatively describe the better surgical outcome predictors for DLSD. With a definite DLSD lesion confirmed by an imaging study, patients who meet the formula scores of 9 or over and have refractory symptoms to non-operative treatment could be better surgical candidates resulting in satisfactory surgical outcomes of over 86%, than those who scored 8 or lower.
Keywords: Lumbar vertebrae; degenerative; outcome assessment; spinal disease; surgical procedure.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The impact of diabetes upon quality of life outcomes after lumbar decompression.Spine J. 2016 Jun;16(6):714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.041. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26704860
-
The impact of preoperative depression on quality of life outcomes after lumbar surgery.Spine J. 2015 Jan 1;15(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jul 4. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25007757
-
An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):357-369. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16526. Epub 2017 May 12. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28498074
-
Changes in vitamin D status after surgery in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its clinical significance.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 1;37(21):E1326-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318268ff05. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22805343
-
Psychological predictors of quality of life and functional outcome in patients undergoing elective surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(2):349-359. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06106-x. Epub 2019 Aug 14. Eur Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31414288
Cited by
-
Development of a model to predict the probability of incurring a complication during spine surgery.Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1337-1354. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06777-5. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33686535
-
Effect of Sagittal Balance on Risk of Falling after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Combined with Posterior Surgery.Yonsei Med J. 2017 Nov;58(6):1177-1185. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.6.1177. Yonsei Med J. 2017. PMID: 29047242 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal Injections: A Narrative Review from a Surgeon's Perspective.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;11(16):2355. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162355. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37628553 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Spine Surgery Using Risk Assessment Tools: a Systematic Review.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Jun;13(3):247-263. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09630-2. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020. PMID: 32388726 Free PMC article. Review.
-
One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Minimal-Invasive Dorsal Percutaneous Fixation of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 27;58(5):606. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050606. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 35630022 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN. Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:2229–2233. - PubMed
-
- Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:722–726. - PubMed
-
- Siebert E, Prüss H, Klingebiel R, Failli V, Einhäupl KM, Schwab JM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:392–403. - PubMed
-
- McKillop AB, Carroll LJ, Battié MC. Depression as a prognostic factor of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Spine J. 2014;14:837–846. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical