Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;5(1):65-71.
doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.27.2.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk

Affiliations

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk

Khaldoun G Tarakji et al. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 May.

Abstract

The incidence of infection following implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing at a faster rate than that of device implantation. Patients with a CIED infection usually require hospitalisation and complete device and lead removal. A significant proportion die from their infection. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is associated with rare but serious complications including major vascular injury or cardiac perforation. Operator experience and advances in lead extraction methods, including laser technology and rotational sheaths, have resulted in procedures having a low risk of complication and mortality. Strategies for preventing CIED infections include intravenous antibiotics and aseptic surgical techniques. An additional method to reduce CIED infection may be the use of antibacterial TYRX™ envelope. Data from non-randomised cohort studies have indicated that antibacterial envelope use can reduce the incidence of CIED infection by more than 80 % in high-risk patients and a randomised clinical trial is ongoing.

Keywords: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections; antibacterial envelope; implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; pacemaker; transvenous lead extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Images of Pocket Infection Over Two Years
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Causes of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection Mortality
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves for One-year Mortality Among Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. The TYRX™ Absorbable Antibacterial Envelope
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. Efficacy of TYRX™ Antibacterial Envelope in High-risk Subjects

References

    1. Beck H, Boden WE, Patibandla S, et al. 50th anniversary of the first successful permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States: historical review and future directions. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:810–8. PMID: 21391322. - PubMed
    1. Uslan DZ, Tleyjeh IM, Baddour LM, et al. Temporal trends in permanent pacemaker implantation: a population-based study. Am Heart J. 2008;155:896–903. DOI: 10.1016/j. ahj.2007.12.022; PMID: 18440339; PMCID: PMC2597171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, et al. 16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1001–6. DOI: 10.1016/j. jacc.2011.04.033; PMID: 21867833. - PubMed
    1. Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009 – a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1013–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540 8159.2011.03150.x; PMID: 21707667. - PubMed
    1. Cabell CH, Heidenreich PA, Chu VH, et al. Increasing rates of cardiac device infections among Medicare beneficiaries: 1990-1999. Am Heart J. 2004;147:582–6. PMID: 15077071. - PubMed