Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;4(3):466-73.
doi: 10.1177/2050640615615301. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

Knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) of large and refractory colonic polyps at a Western centre: Feasibility, safety and efficacy study to guide future practice

Rupam Bhattacharyya  1 , Fergus Jq Chedgy  1 , Kesavan Kandiah  1 , Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton  1 , Pradeep Bhandari  1
Affiliations

Knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) of large and refractory colonic polyps at a Western centre: Feasibility, safety and efficacy study to guide future practice

Rupam Bhattacharyya et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is widely practiced in western countries. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is very effective for treating complex polyps but colonic ESD in the western setting remains challenging. We have developed a novel technique of knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) for the resection of these complex lesions. Here we aim to describe the technique, evaluate its outcomes, identify outcome predictors and define its learning curve.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients who had large and refractory polyps resected by KAR at our institution from 2007 to 2013. Polyp characteristics and procedure details were recorded. Endoscopic follow-up was performed to identify recurrence.

Results: A total of 170 patients with polyps 20-170 mm in size were treated by KAR and followed up for a mean of 31.5 months (range 12-84 months). 29% of the polyps were >50 mm, 22% had fibrosis from previous unsuccessful interventions and 25% were in the right colon. The perforation rate (1.2%) and bleeding rate (4.7%) were acceptable and managed conservatively in most patients. Recurrence rate after the first attempt was 13.1%. Recurrence was significantly increased by polyp size >50 mm (p = 0.008; OR 5.03, 95% CI 1.54-16.48), presence of fibrosis (p = 0.002; OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.97-22.07) and piecemeal resection (p < 0.001; OR 0.31, CI 0.078-1.12). Cure rates were 87% after the first attempt, improving to 95.6% with further attempts. En bloc resection rate showed a linear increase and reached almost 80% as the endoscopist's cumulative experience approached 100 cases.

Conclusion: This is the largest reported Western series on KAR in the colon. We have demonstrated the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this technique in the treatment of complex polyps, with or without fibrosis and at all sites. KAR has shown better outcomes than either EMR or ESD. We have also managed to identify significant outcome predictors and define the learning curve.

Keywords: EMR; ESD; Endoscopic mucosal resection; colonic polyps; colonoscopy; difficult polyps; endoscopic submucosal dissection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) DALM in transverse colon assessed with HDWL; (b) Same lesion with FICE; (c) Same lesion with indigo carmine; (d) Marking of the lesion; (e) Lesion following submucosal injection; (f) Circumferential mucosal incision; (g) Snare resection following circumferential dissection and (h) KAR resection base.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient outcomes after KAR. KAR: knife-assisted snare resection; FU: follow-up; CA: cancer.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
En bloc resection rates and numbers of patients treated. Cumulative patient numbers treated by knife-assisted snare resection (KAR).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S, et al. Large refractory colonic polyps: Is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1128–1136. - PubMed
    1. Khasab M, Eid E, Rusche M, et al. Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 344–349. - PubMed
    1. Kedia P, Waye JD. Colon polypectomy: A review of routine and advanced techniques. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 657–665. - PubMed
    1. Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 723–729. - PubMed
    1. Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Fujita T, et al. Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 714–722. - PubMed