Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation and Concomitant Device Occlusion to Treat Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy Study
- PMID: 27406602
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003710
Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation and Concomitant Device Occlusion to Treat Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy Study
Abstract
Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) electric isolation is reported to improve persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcomes. However, loss of LAA mechanical function may increase thromboembolic risk. Concomitant LAA electric isolation and occlusion as part of conventional AF ablation has never been tested in humans. We therefore evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of LAA electric isolation and occlusion in patients undergoing long-standing persistent AF ablation.
Methods and results: Patients with long-standing persistent AF (age, 68±7 years; left atrium diameter, 46±3 mm; and AF duration, 25±15 months) underwent AF ablation, LAA electric isolation, and occlusion. Outcomes were compared with a balanced (1:2 ratio) control group who had AF ablation alone. Among 22 patients who underwent ablation, LAA electric isolation was possible in 20. Intraprocedural LAA reconnection occurred in 17 of 20 (85%) patients, predominantly at anterior and superior locations. All were reisolated. LAA occlusion was successful in all 20 patients. There were no major periprocedural complications. Imaging at 45 days and 9 months confirmed satisfactory device position and excluded pericardial effusion. One of twenty (5%) patients had a gap of ≥5 mm requiring anticoagulation. Nineteen of twenty (95%) patients stopped warfarin at 3 months. Without antiarrhythmic drugs, freedom from AF at 12 months after a single procedure was significantly higher in the study group (19/20, 95%) than in the control group (25/40, 63%), P=0.036. Freedom from atrial arrhythmias was demonstrated in 12 of 20 (60%) and 18 of 20 (90%) patients after 1 and ≤2 procedures (mean, 1.3), respectively.
Conclusions: Persistent AF ablation, LAA electric isolation, and mechanical occlusion can be performed concomitantly. This technique may improve the success of persistent AF ablation while obviating the need for chronic anticoagulation.
Clinical trial registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02028130.
Keywords: atrial appendage; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; thromboembolism; warfarin.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
Left Atrial Appendage After Electrical Isolation: To Occlude or Not To Occlude, That Is the Question.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;9(7):e004372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004372. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 27406607 No abstract available.
-
Letter by Vroomen et al Regarding Article, "Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation and Concomitant Device Occlusion to Treat Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy Study".Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;9(10):e004631. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004631. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 27729341 No abstract available.
-
Response by Panikker et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation and Concomitant Device Occlusion to Treat Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy Study".Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;9(10):e004652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004652. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 27729343 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous