Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e011856.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011856.

Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption (ROMPA): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption (ROMPA): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Francisco Colomina-Climent et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: There is a lack of evidence in the efficacy of the coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) to reduce the mortality rate in septic shock. To fill this gap, we have designed the ROMPA study (Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption) to confirm whether treatment with an adequate dose of treated plasma by CPFA could confer a clinical benefit.

Methods and analysis: Our study is a multicentric randomised clinical trial with a 28-day and 90-day follow-up and allocation ratio 1:1. Its aim is to clarify whether the application of high doses of CPFA (treated plasma ≥0.20 L/kg/day) in the first 3 days after randomisation, in addition to the current clinical practice, is able to reduce hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs) at 28 and 90 days after initiation of the therapy. The study will be performed in 10 ICUs in the Southeast of Spain which follow the same protocol in this disease (based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign). Our trial is designed to be able to demonstrate an absolute mortality reduction of 20% (α=0.05; 1-β=0.8; n=190(95×2)). The severity of the process, ensuring the recruitment of patients with a high probability of death (50% in the control group), will be achieved through an adequate stratification by using both severity scores and classical definitions of severe sepsis/septic shock and dynamic parameters. Our centres are fully aware of the many pitfalls associated with previous medical device trials. Trying to reduce these problems, we have developed a training programme to improve the CPFA use (especially clotting problems).

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of all the participant centres. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, as well as national and international conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT02357433; Pre-results.

Keywords: INFECTIOUS DISEASES; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AMPLYA system from Bellco Societa unipersonales a r.l. The resin cartridge and plasma filter are in position and ready for use. The copyright holder (Bellco) has approved the usage of this figure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the CPFA circuit. The extracorporeal circuit consisting of a plasma filter (A), a resin cartridge (B) and a high-flux dialyser (C). Blood pass through a plasma filter, extracted plasma is purified by adsorption on a resin cartridge and the reconstituted blood (●) flows through a high-permeability haemofilter, in which convective exchanges are realised in a postdilution mode (substitution). The copyright holder (Bellco) has approved the usage of this figure. CPFA, coupled plasma filtration adsorption; UF, ultrafiltrate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study diagram. This shows the general study design and includes: (1) registration: the patient is considered ‘enrolled’ once informed consent has been obtained. (2) Recruitment phase: must occur within the first 12 hours of septic shock diagnosis. (3) Randomisation: group A (CPFA) or group B (control). (4) Statistical evaluations: at the end of the study and after follow-up. ARF, acute renal failure; CPFA, coupled plasma filtration adsorption; CVVH, continuous veno-venous haemofiltration.

References

    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2013;369:840–51. 10.1056/NEJMra1208623 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Poll T, Opal SM. Host-pathogen interactions in sepsis. Lancet Infect Dis 2008;8:32–43. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70265-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bone RC, Grodzin CJ, Balk RA. Sepsis: a new hypothesis for pathogenesis of the disease process. Chest 1997;112:235–43. 10.1378/chest.112.1.235 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCloskey RV, Straube RC, Sanders C et al. . Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS trial study group. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:1–5. 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beutler B, Greenwald D, Hulmes JD et al. . Identity of tumour necrosis factor and the macrophage-secreted factor cachectin. Nature 1985;316:552–4. 10.1038/316552a0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources