Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan;60(1):20-4.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(04)80151-5. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Treatment of Casualties in a Forward Hospital of Indian Army : Nine year Experience

Affiliations

Treatment of Casualties in a Forward Hospital of Indian Army : Nine year Experience

K M Rai et al. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Background: To analyze the outcome of the management of casualties in a level II trauma centre of a forward hospital of Armed Forces over a nine year period. Retrospective analysis of all casualties received in a single forward hospital of Indian Army was carried out.

Method: During 9 years (1990-1998), a total of 5737 casualties were received in a single level II zonal hospital of the Army in a forward area. Majority of the injuries were caused by bullets, or by fragments of improvised explosive devices. A policy of aggressive resuscitation and early primary repair of injuries was followed. General surgeons routinely performed craniotomies, thoracotomies, laparotomies, stabilization of fractures by fixators and repair of vascular injuries.

Result: 38% of patients had injuries to several body parts (polytrauma), resulting in a total of 8578 injuries. Region-wise distribution of injuries was as follows : 14.2% head and neck injuries, 13.3% chest wounds, 13.5% abdominal injury and 59% extremity wounds. The overall mortality rate was 3.6%. The complication rate was about 7% with infection as the major complication. The results of primary repair of colonic injuries were similar to those of staged repairs. The results after primary closure of war wounds were better than those treated with delayed primary closure in selected cases.

Conclusion: Prompt evacuation, speedy resuscitation and early definitive repair of war injuries results in low mortality and morbidity. A motivated and dedicated team and adequate availability of blood and ancillary services adds to the excellent outcome. The policy of primary repair of colonic and selected soft tissue injuries appears justified in selected cases.

Keywords: Casualties; Improvised Explosive Devices; Militancy; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Champion HR, Sacco WI. Trauma Scoring. In: Mattox KL, Moore EE, Feliciano DV, editors. Trauma. Appleton and Lange; Norwalk: 1988. pp. 63–77.
    1. Trunkey DD, Siegel J, Baker SP, Gennaralli TA. Current status of trauma severity indices. J Trauma. 1983;23:185–201. - PubMed
    1. Suri YV, Venugopalan VM, Tripathy PC, Mahajan TR, Rao AVTK. Militancy Trauma: Anaesthesia and Critical Care Management. MJAFI. 1994;50(2):117–122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whelan TJ, Burkhalter WE, Gomez A. Management of war wounds. In: Welch CE, editor. Vol 3. Year Book Medical Publishers; Chicago: 1968. pp. 249–261. (Advances in Surgery).
    1. Gray R. Surgery of war disaster. Trop Doct. 1991;21(Suppl 1):56–62. - PubMed

Uncited References

    1. Beebe GW, DeBakey ME. Battle Casualties. Charles C Thomas; Springfield III: 1952. pp. 165–205.
    1. Reister FA. Battle casualties and medical statistics: US Army experience in Korean War. US Govt Printing Office; Washington DC: 1973. p. 35.
    1. Rukovanski M. Spinal cord injuries caused by missile weapons in the Croatian war. J Trauma. 1996;40:S189–S192. - PubMed
    1. Bzik KD, Bellamy RF. A note on combat casualty statistics. Mil Med. 1984;149:229–230. - PubMed
    1. Rozin R, Klausner JM. New concepts of forward combat surgery. Injury. 1988;19:193–196. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources