Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;63(1):15-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80098-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience

Affiliations

Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience

Wvbs Ramalingam et al. Med J Armed Forces India. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Stage III and IV cancers of larynx and hypopharynx often require total laryngectomy which leaves the patient with severe communication handicap. In such laryngectomised patients tracheo-esophageal puncture is the best way for voice rehabilitation using either Blom-Singer® prosthesis or Provox® indwelling valve.

Methods: A prospective comparative study of Blom-Singer® prosthesis and Provox® indwelling valves placed in Tracheo-esophageal Punctures (TEP) for voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy was carried out at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai and Malignant Diseases Treatment Centre of Armed Forces, to assess their efficacy. This report comprises of our experience in 41 (39 males and two females) laryngtectomees who underwent TEP of which 15 patients were fitted with low pressure Blom-Singer® prostheses and 26 with Provox® indwelling prostheses.

Results: Prostheses related problems like granuloma formation, leakage, candidal growth over the valves and prosthetic decay were significantly less in the patients fitted with Provox® prosthesis. Dislodgement of prosthesis with closure of the tract or persistent fistula formation and creation of false passage, while reinsertion were problems encountered in the Blom-Singer group. After three months, speech assessment revealed a better quality of voice production and patient compliance in maintaining the prosthesis in the case of Provox® indwelling valve.

Conclusion: In Indian scenario where illitracy amongst the patients hinders in maintainence of Blom-Singer® prosthesis, Provox® indwelling value is an appropriate choice for voice rehabilitation.

Keywords: Blom-Singer® prosthesis; Provox® Valve; Tracheo-esophageal puncture (TEP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
A-shows Blom Singer prosthesis in situ, B-shows Blom Singer prosthesis on left and provox valve on right, C-shows early decay of Blom Singer prosthesis due to improper care and fungal infection, D-shows Blom Singer prosthesis in false track

References

    1. Mehta AR, Sarkar S, Mehta SA, Bachher GK. The Indian experience with immediate tracheo-esophageal puncture for voice restoration. Eur Arch Otolaryngol. 1995;252:209–214. - PubMed
    1. Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989:529–533. - PubMed
    1. Hilgers FJM, Schouwenburg PF. A new low-resistance, self retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:1202–1207. - PubMed
    1. Brouwer B, Snow GB, Dam van FS. Experience of patients who undergo laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 1979;4:109–118. - PubMed
    1. Williams SE, Watson JB. Speaking proficiency variation according to method of alarygeal voicing. Laryngoscope. 1987;97:737–739. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources